Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Number Of Fedora 27 Features Get Pushed Back To Fedora 28

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A Number Of Fedora 27 Features Get Pushed Back To Fedora 28

    Phoronix: A Number Of Fedora 27 Features Get Pushed Back To Fedora 28

    Due to delays in the Fedora 26 release pushing it back by more than one month, the Fedora 27 schedule is rather tight with the change completion deadline having already been earlier this month and the Fedora 27 branching from Rawhide taking place in four days...

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...-Pushes-To-F28

  • #2
    this comes to no surprise really, but you'll still be able to get PHP7.2 from remi's Repo . https://rpms.remirepo.net/

    Comment


    • #3
      I always found the php 7.2 deadline a bit tight - it seemed that the final release was scheduled until after Fedora 27.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by You- View Post
        I always found the php 7.2 deadline a bit tight - it seemed that the final release was scheduled until after Fedora 27.
        i thinjk you'll find the F27 is the one thats tight which is my guess is why there removing Features, i still cant see why it cant get in, i mean Fedora has shipped a Belta or RC's of Xserver before, same could be said about Java9

        Comment


        • #5
          I think that delays while releasing fedora 26 is just an excuse. fedora 27 will probably be a base for rhel 8, so they don't want any revolutions there.

          list of bugs for rhel 8 was published recently https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist....ormat=advanced
          but it's not public anymore, so I guess that heavy work on new rhel started.

          Comment


          • #6
            Best feature of F27 will be a more formal way to ignore alleged blocker bugs on irrelevant desktops. Wise call.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by GhostOfFunkS View Post
              Best feature of F27 will be a more formal way to ignore alleged blocker bugs on irrelevant desktops. Wise call.
              Yeah, GNOME needs all help it can get to rewrite stuff that works already.

              Meanwhile, stuff that can actually be of interest to people, like 32-bit UEFI support is getting postponed.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by starshipeleven View Post
                Yeah, GNOME needs all help it can get to rewrite stuff that works already.
                There is no need to be butthurt about it. The GNOME surge benefits the vast majority of dekstop users. Maybe you should find your safe space and calm down? Devuan is a perfect time capsule for you.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by GhostOfFunkS View Post
                  There is no need to be fanboi about it. The GNOME surge benefits around 30% of dekstop users. Maybe I should find something more useful to do with my time?
                  fixed.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Like Qt. Every "fix" comes with multiple regressions.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X