Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fedora 27 Will See 32-bit UEFI, Glibc 2.27, Bay/Cherry Trail Improvements

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fedora 27 Will See 32-bit UEFI, Glibc 2.27, Bay/Cherry Trail Improvements

    Phoronix: Fedora 27 Will See 32-bit UEFI, Glibc 2.27, Bay/Cherry Trail Improvements

    The Fedora Engineering and Steering Committee (FESCo) on Friday approved a number of the early change proposals for Fedora 27...

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...-Trail-Changes

  • #2
    Michael please fix the title (Glibc 2.26).

    Comment


    • #3
      Oh? And how are they to fix those Cherry Trail issues? Switch to the linux-sunxi kernel?

      Comment


      • #4
        Typo:
        ​​​​​​
        Originally posted by phoronix View Post
        As well, the other modular release and modular server related change proposa.s

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by GreatEmerald View Post
          Oh? And how are they to fix those Cherry Trail issues? Switch to the linux-sunxi kernel?
          Hans submit his changes to upstream. In 4.8/4.9 times there was much more patches in his tree, but now most of the work is upstreamed (but not all, unfortunately).

          Comment


          • #6
            I hope I don't have to wait for glibc 2.26 to get a fix for this - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471427

            On the plus side my productivity might increase if I can't play Civ

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by GreatEmerald View Post
              Oh? And how are they to fix those Cherry Trail issues? Switch to the linux-sunxi kernel?
              How is linux-sunxi (Allwinner ARM) related to Cherry Trail (Intel x86)?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by caligula View Post
                How is linux-sunxi (Allwinner ARM) related to Cherry Trail (Intel x86)?
                github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by RussianNeuroMancer View Post
                  Hans submit his changes to upstream. In 4.8/4.9 times there was much more patches in his tree, but now most of the work is upstreamed (but not all, unfortunately).
                  Yea, I know (I'll try an upstream kernel with a few cherry-picked patches myself soon enough). I was just wondering what could Fedora do about the situation that's not already covered by the mainline kernel development process...

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X