Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ubuntu 16.10 Doesn't Change Much With Performance, Clear Linux Still Leads In Most Tests

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    unapproved

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by doom_Oo7 View Post

      I don't know but I recompile all the software on my main system with -Ofast -march=native and I don't remember having a weird crash or something like this. -O3 may have been crashy two decades ago but nowadays it works really well.
      Stop spreading the FUD and try it yourself. Many games use -O3 because the maximum speed is good. Many programs work and many programs don't give a crap if the floats are computed a bit differently. -O3 should be totally safe and bug reports should be made if some basic software doing integer computation fails.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by caligula View Post

        Stop spreading the FUD and try it yourself. Many games use -O3 because the maximum speed is good. Many programs work and many programs don't give a crap if the floats are computed a bit differently. -O3 should be totally safe and bug reports should be made if some basic software doing integer computation fails.
        building dev-scheme/guile-2.0.12-r1 fails for me with `-march=native -Ofast -pipe`.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by cj.wijtmans View Post

          building dev-scheme/guile-2.0.12-r1 fails for me with `-march=native -Ofast -pipe`.
          Still spreading FUD eh? Would help if you didnt use Ofast you know. The discussion was about O3.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by SaucyJack View Post

            Still spreading FUD eh? Would help if you didnt use Ofast you know. The discussion was about O3.
            FWIW in Clear Linux we have a per package attribute that marks the package "performance sensitive" "size sensitive' or "normal", and 3 different sets of CFLAGS are used between these based on this attribute.

            these map largely to O3 / Os / O2 but also some other more minor flags like LTO (for performance sensitive)

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by SaucyJack View Post

              Still spreading FUD eh? Would help if you didnt use Ofast you know. The discussion was about O3.
              Ofast implies O3. I can try again with just O3 but i amguessing the same result.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by arjan_intel View Post

                FWIW in Clear Linux we have a per package attribute that marks the package "performance sensitive" "size sensitive' or "normal", and 3 different sets of CFLAGS are used between these based on this attribute.

                these map largely to O3 / Os / O2 but also some other more minor flags like LTO (for performance sensitive)
                Could this be contributed to gentoo?

                Comment

                Working...
                X