A Fedora Remix from Russian Fedora (Yandex)
Full Fedora 20, with the extras, including codecs, chromium, and more
It boots with the Fedora logos and all.
I standardized on this remix
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
LinuxCon: What's Going On With Fedora.Next
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by gilboa View PostNeither can be solved by Fedora.
The first (Steam) can only be solved by steam.
The second (codecs) can only be solved when the legal issues are resolved.
Originally posted by Stellarwind View PostYou can use Qubes OS if you need that kind of security.
i was asking about specific project that is in the works.
note that this post already states more or less all subproject states, well everything but amount of inclusion in F21Last edited by justmy2cents; 24 August 2014, 01:42 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sarmad View PostWhat I am hoping for is a version for the general public that we can recommend to people instead of Ubuntu. Fedora overall feels more solid than Ubuntu now but there are still certain aspects that can get in the way for the general public. <b>An example I can think of is the inability to start Steam in Big Picture Mode on Fedora 20 without first turning off SELinux. Obviously, installing codecs and binary drivers is another major issue for the general public</b>.
The first (Steam) can only be solved by steam.
The second (codecs) can only be solved when the legal issues are resolved.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mattdm View PostOf course. We're just targeting Workstation at a specific set of end users. That doesn't mean that it won't be good for regular users. It's just indicative of our focus: where we'll prioritize feedback, how we'll measure success, etc. "All end users" is too big be useful in that way.
We'll also provide non-workstation desktop spins at the current (or better!) quality, including different desktop technologies like KDE and Xfce. (No one has stepped up to really work on a non-workstation Gnome spin, but that would be possible too.)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by justmy2cents View Posthow far along is docker desktop integration? this would probably be one of my big 3 i'm waiting for wayland,next gl and docker desktop sandoboxing
Leave a comment:
-
sorry for the following ramble
Originally posted by mattdm View PostWe're just targeting Workstation at a specific set of end users. That doesn't mean that it won't be good for regular users. It's just indicative of our focus: where we'll prioritize feedback, how we'll measure success, etc. "All end users" is too big be useful in that way.
While Workstation may not be shunning regular users, by not courting them, and instead actively focusing on developers, much the same effect may be accomplished. An argument could be made that with the advent of Workstation there hasn't been that much of an actual change in the targeted end user, but that perhaps the marketing is/will be more matter-of-fact about it now, and the deliverable will be more tailored. While Ubuntu seems more preoccupied with mobile at the moment (not to say that it isn't still targeting the regular user desktop/laptop space, if only for the purpose of leverage towards its other, potentially more lucrative, aspirations), the bread and butter of distros like Linux Mint certainly is the regular user market segment. I don't think all the distributions constituting the distro landscape are so interchangeable that users choosing Ubuntu-based distros as opposed to Fedora-based distros has exactly the same impact, perceived or realized, on Fedora the brand as well as the Fedora ecosystem.
This isn't meant to be negative, I'm just not certain at this point that the Fedora.next changes will make the Fedora Project more successful in fact. Clearly the metrics by which the Fedora Project measures success will be changed somewhat.
Leave a comment:
-
To be honest I have to agree at this point... Linux distros are boring. All of the interesting stuff going on right now is with infrastructure and both steam and gog, I've used every version of fedora on one PC or another since 12, and openSUSE since 11.3, and yet for all that time the distro parts themselves have remained rather stagnant from the perspective of a desktop user. Yes there's been minor changes like the shift from system-config-firewall to firewalld, but let's be honest most of the interesting stuff that's been going on for the past few years has been cross-distro
On the other hand PC-BSD is very interesting in spite of all of it's rough edges, why? Because unlike Ubuntu, Fedora, openSUSE, or any other distro I'm aware of, it's working on developing and designing a product for the desktop as opposed to just developing a fancy package manager but otherwise just providing a set of packages. Once PC-BSD cleans up it's rough edges and FreeBSD expands and improves it's hardware support I could seriously see it giving linux distros a run for their money.
Fedora.Next is definitely a good step in the direction of working to deal with this though although I'm withholding my judgement on it until I see how it's actually implemented in practice
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mattdm View PostNot something we'll see in F21, but after that... possibilities are open. The perfect desktop container solution has a lot of prerequisites (including wayland, actually), so it's going to be a while.
hmm, perfect... yes, also kdbus and portals too as far as i'm aware. as well as systemd user integration for docker.
i'm more or less asking to play with options and be able to create something like imperfect wine containers. security is not major concern while i'm playing with that. i'd guess there will be copr kdbus kernel for next too, so that only leaves systemd more or less
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by justmy2cents View Posthow far along is docker desktop integration? this would probably be one of my big 3 i'm waiting for wayland,next gl and docker desktop sandoboxing
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: