Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

An Ubuntu MATE Desktop Spin Might Still Materialize

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prescott
    replied
    Why Ubuntu?

    What would be the advantage of Ubuntu with Mate, over Linux Mint with Mate?

    In other words why bother?

    Leave a comment:


  • stevenc
    replied
    Debian packages are available already in the main archive for Debian jessie - apt-get install mate-desktop-environment

    As an Xfce4 user I didn't notice all that much difference.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnc
    replied
    When I finally upgrade to 14.04 I'll probably throw MATE on there. Two years of Unity is enough insanity for me.

    Now we just need somebody to de-idiotify all the GNOME apps.

    Leave a comment:


  • wargames
    replied
    Originally posted by teresaejunior View Post
    I have tried MATE about one year ago, and I found it a pretty nice desktop, but something I have always wondered, no trolling: is there really anything MATE has that Xfce4 hasn't? I know FOSS is all about choice, but I found them very similar, and Xfce4 a bit more customizable.
    Yes, there is something Xfce doesn't have: active development (and don't go and look at their git repository, because almost all recent activity has to do with translations).

    Leave a comment:


  • Apopas
    replied
    Originally posted by teresaejunior View Post
    I have tried MATE about one year ago, and I found it a pretty nice desktop, but something I have always wondered, no trolling: is there really anything MATE has that Xfce4 hasn't? I know FOSS is all about choice, but I found them very similar, and Xfce4 a bit more customizable.
    That's what I think as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • belal1
    replied
    Originally posted by NothingMuchHereToSay View Post
    This is so godawfully bad, I can't imagine- Well actually I can, because they're hippies. Stuck in the past with their shitty context menus, I mean, really? MATE is a desktop that just NEEDS to die, why not make an Ubuntu spin off of Enlightenment? Something that actually LOOKS modern and that actually runs beautifully in software mode? Really, it boggles my mind as to why people say "durr, why isn't linux catching on yet?" Simple, you're a bunch of hippies that likes old looks and godawfully bad design choices from Windows 95. Use what you want, I don't care, but stop complaining about your zombie of a desktop environment not being the default desktop on anything except Mint.
    MATE doesn't need to die. It has a very functional UI that works for many people. It was created because there was a demand for the old Gnome2 DE. Personally, I don't use any of this shit but if I had a choice between Unity or MATE, I'd choose MATE. Not that I had Unity, but the old GNOME2 worked fine for me. I don't need to impress other users. I just need my OS to work for me. Get it? So all this nonsense about people complaining that Linux is stuck in the past: You need to get off their balls buddy. If a DE works for you, it works. If it doesn't, move on but don't drag others with you.

    Leave a comment:


  • teresaejunior
    replied
    I have tried MATE about one year ago, and I found it a pretty nice desktop, but something I have always wondered, no trolling: is there really anything MATE has that Xfce4 hasn't? I know FOSS is all about choice, but I found them very similar, and Xfce4 a bit more customizable.

    Leave a comment:


  • wargames
    replied
    Originally posted by NothingMuchHereToSay View Post
    This is so godawfully bad, I can't imagine- Well actually I can, because they're hippies. Stuck in the past with their shitty context menus, I mean, really? MATE is a desktop that just NEEDS to die, why not make an Ubuntu spin off of Enlightenment? Something that actually LOOKS modern and that actually runs beautifully in software mode? Really, it boggles my mind as to why people say "durr, why isn't linux catching on yet?" Simple, you're a bunch of hippies that likes old looks and godawfully bad design choices from Windows 95. Use what you want, I don't care, but stop complaining about your zombie of a desktop environment not being the default desktop on anything except Mint.
    To me, nothing in Linux comes close to the Windows 7 look with a small taskbar and Aero enabled. Obviously Windows Explorer is not the best file manager, but you get used to it.

    If the Gnome guys were willing to listen, we wouldn't have Cinnamon and MATE nowadays. So go and complain to them, because they are all a bunch of tabletoid gnomes.

    Leave a comment:


  • deanjo
    replied
    Originally posted by enfocomp View Post
    This is great news, perhaps all the "Unity is the worst thing ever" people can lay off all the Ubuntu hate now.
    That won't happen until Unity dies and Ubuntu features some other desktop as default.

    Leave a comment:


  • NothingMuchHereToSay
    replied
    This is so godawfully bad, I can't imagine- Well actually I can, because they're hippies. Stuck in the past with their shitty context menus, I mean, really? MATE is a desktop that just NEEDS to die, why not make an Ubuntu spin off of Enlightenment? Something that actually LOOKS modern and that actually runs beautifully in software mode? Really, it boggles my mind as to why people say "durr, why isn't linux catching on yet?" Simple, you're a bunch of hippies that likes old looks and godawfully bad design choices from Windows 95. Use what you want, I don't care, but stop complaining about your zombie of a desktop environment not being the default desktop on anything except Mint.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X