Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Systemd Is The Future Of Debian

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by TheBlackCat View Post
    Except apparently you have the right to tell them to take the time to support two init systems.
    I am sorry..? I have never said any such thing. You'll have to explain this one to me.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Marc Driftmeyer View Post
      launchd
      Indeed. Funnily enough, they decided to go in house on license grounds (considering that porting was not much easier that doing something from scratch). Ironic, if you ask me.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Annabel View Post
        and this is bad, the less proprietary software, the better.
        That does not make any sense. If you value "no software" higher than "some proprietary software", you don't really deserve the world you're living in (well, at least, the computer you are using).

        Comment


        • Originally posted by scaine View Post
          Conveniently forgetting ChromeOS, I guess.
          chromeos shares upstart usage with ubuntu only by accident - author of upstart conveniently is working on chromeos
          while authors of all other ubunty-specific shit aren't

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Qwerry View Post
            Mir was created because Wayland wouldn't "fit their needs"
            wayland did fit their needs, they just lacked clue to understand that

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Qwerry View Post
              I fail to see anything Canonical possibly wouldn't be able to do with systemd that they are able to do with Upstart.
              impose cla

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Annabel View Post
                Since when creating a new free software project (Mir) is a "crap" move?
                right from point when you start to require cla, kid

                Comment


                • Originally posted by marciocr View Post
                  It's just a impression, or almost nobody care about the technical differences between systemd and upstart?
                  almost everyone cares. cla is what made upstart suck technically compared to systemd, otherwise systemd developers would just rework upstart into systemd

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Annabel View Post
                    it's not worse than using permissive licensed software
                    but you could fork it anyway if you don't like the CLA

                    in my opinion GPL > GPL + CLA > permissive license
                    in my opinion you are moron
                    did you read 3 links ppl gave to you on subject ?
                    Last edited by pal666; 12 February 2014, 08:10 AM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ObiWan View Post
                      Just release patches for Debians Upstart GPL only, and Canonical can't legaly use in a closed source version.
                      just release patches for making systemd portable to inferior kernels
                      smart ppl know that maintaining forks is hard

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X