Originally posted by Pajn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Debian To Switch To Systemd Or Upstart
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Vim_User View PostNot that I am aware of. There is of course the debate page, but the arguments there are written by the proponents of the init systems, so that isn't neutral at all.
Upstart:
Upstart is the best because it isn't SystemD
SystemD:
SystemD is the best because it isn't Upstart
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ibidem View PostAssuming that (1) systemd doesn't push that up by a couple versions within the next year or so (which would be a quite reasonable pace); (2) systemd can be relied on to not drop support for kernels that are ~3 years old; and (3) that Debian doesn't care about users who needed a kernel that was 3 releases older.
Systemd changes too fast for Debian, IMHO. 2 kernel releases is too little safety, and for Raspian that's actually 1 kernel release (they use 3.1.x).
And there are people asking about using Jessie with 2.6.32, which is _currently_ supported.
There have been transitions in the past (such as udev) where the dist-upgrade should be performed as:
* Update sources.list
* Install new kernel and new udev
* Reboot
* Proceed with dist-upgrade
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pajn View PostSad, I have read the debate page and that is just worthless.
Upstart:
Upstart is the best because it isn't SystemD
SystemD:
SystemD is the best because it isn't Upstart
Upstart:
Is the best because it isn't systemd
systemd:
Is the best because it was developed after upstart and thus is more recent and shiny.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pajn View PostPros:
To me SystemD looks more and more like a cancer, it grows and grows and it gets harder and
harder to remove it without killing the patient.
If Debian would switch to SystemD, the rest would be forced to take the same route as it's
no longer possible to use another init deamon without getting too much trouble.Originally posted by erendorn View PostThe reason it grows is that it provides features that developers, maintainers and admins want to have, and that no other init system provides.
The reason it's harder and harder to remove is that it provides features that developers, maintainers and admins actually use, and that no other init system provides.
You cannot really count that as a con.
I have to say, systemd is really fast, I think it's the future, and that it could even be modularized after the development slows down. Even though my distro (Ubuntu) uses Upstart, I'd much rather have it. It was really worth the speed increase last time I installed it; and that was on a Pentium 4! I hope they pick systemd.
Comment
Comment