In defense of
Normally I'd let this slide but you're testing different kernels here.
Cent0S is using 2.6.32: You're comparing it against Ubuntu 12.04 when you should be comparing it against Ubuntu 10.04.
At best, you should be comparing against Slackware 13.1 (2.6.34) and so on....
Linux 3.5 has made so many changes to the Ext4 file-system I wouldn't even know where to start talking about performance in relation to your test criteria.
Another thing about Slackware is that if you choose the default -- install everything -- then most likely you got the HUGE Kernel compiled i486.
You'd basically have to check /boot/vmlinuz to see where it's symlink'd to.
To recap: Cent0S 6.2 -> Ubuntu 10.04 [ 2.6.32 kernel ]
Cent0S 6.2 -> Slackware 13.1 [ never used the .32 stable ]
....
Respectfully,.
Normally I'd let this slide but you're testing different kernels here.
Cent0S is using 2.6.32: You're comparing it against Ubuntu 12.04 when you should be comparing it against Ubuntu 10.04.
At best, you should be comparing against Slackware 13.1 (2.6.34) and so on....
Linux 3.5 has made so many changes to the Ext4 file-system I wouldn't even know where to start talking about performance in relation to your test criteria.
Another thing about Slackware is that if you choose the default -- install everything -- then most likely you got the HUGE Kernel compiled i486.
You'd basically have to check /boot/vmlinuz to see where it's symlink'd to.
To recap: Cent0S 6.2 -> Ubuntu 10.04 [ 2.6.32 kernel ]
Cent0S 6.2 -> Slackware 13.1 [ never used the .32 stable ]
....
Respectfully,.
Comment