Originally posted by droidhacker
View Post
And writing an extension to entirely replicate unity in gnome-shell would be a nightmare if not impossible. As I mentioned in my previous post, linux mint tried implementing their smaller customizations with shell extensions and ran into so many issues that they forked the shell... Gnome-shell extensions work great for smaller stuff, but when you try to implement big changes the results are often much worse than desired. Extensions are excellent for augmenting your experience, but definitely not always ideal for fundamentally changing your experience
A lot of the popular gnome-shell extensions just do small things, like adding stuff to the panel, which can be achieved with unity indicators for example. Unity does have a degree of customization via indicators, scopes, lenses and various tweak tools. While gnome-shell does have much more customization possibilities (and a nice addons website), unity isn't exactly as rigid as some would make it out to be
I've found that unity has pretty much all the features I need out of the box, whilst gnome-shell doesn't, and I'm sure I'm not the only one this is true for. So why shouldn't we like unity better? As with all things OSS, choice is great
Canonical is also starting to do some really cool stuff, like the HUD and Web apps (http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/07/u...ture-for-12-10). And I'm sure gnome is doing their own cool stuff
Comment