Originally posted by sjukfan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A GNOME Flavor Of Ubuntu - "GNOME-buntu"
Collapse
X
-
-
Not on Ubuntu so I don't really see the problem here. Is it really too hard to ask for the users to type sudo apt-get install gnome?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kraftman View PostYou've got to be kidding. I can figure this out much easier in Unity, Xfce and KDE of course. They're also much more comfortable to use. Btw. sticking to upstream means a failure in this case. Ubuntu is far more popular than Fedora and its shitty desktop.
Leave a comment:
-
Wrong focus?
Maybe the focus should instead be on making Unity up-to-date so it can be used with the latest GNOME?
So Unity will always depend on the latest GNOME.
PS. I'd like to see GNOME Classic get some more love & attention.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by drag View PostAs far as 'multitasking' goes if you can't figure out how to do it in Gnome-shell then you won't be able to figure out how to do it on any desktop. It provides a significant improvement in the speed of switching/selecting between large numbers of windowsLast edited by kraftman; 12 May 2012, 04:15 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
This GNOME Ubuntu flavor would bring in GNOME Boxes, Abiword/Gnumeric rather than LibreOffice, ....
Originally posted by LinuxID10T View PostObviously I realize this, what I am saying is that it would be nice if they just included them by default considering their negligable size.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by StephanG View PostThat reminds me, whatever happened to Gobuntu?
Because Ubuntu now incorporates a "free software only" installer option, the Gobuntu project was rendered redundant in early 2008. As a result Canonical made the decision officially to end the Gobuntu project with version 8.04.
Leave a comment:
-
The most modern Linux desktop is, and has been for a long time, provided by Fedora. This includes Gnome-shell.
The further Ubuntu strays from what Gnome folks, Linux kernel, and Linux 'plumbing' folks are doing on Fedora the farther they will fall behind because development is not their core competency.
As far as 'multitasking' goes if you can't figure out how to do it in Gnome-shell then you won't be able to figure out how to do it on any desktop. It provides a significant improvement in the speed of switching/selecting between large numbers of windows. With Gnome-shell I can break my dependence on window tabs and nesting shells using tmux/screen due to the fact that the Window manager is now capable enough. This is something that I couldn't do on Gnome 2 and other desktops I regularly use.
And unlike other systems I can do this without having to manually micromanage my window through static arrangements and scripting, which is something that always irritated the hell out of me.Last edited by drag; 11 May 2012, 04:31 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
I think it's easier to multitask with webos than gnome shell.
Canonical was wise to split from gnome and try to go their own way. It's probably the only practical way to modernize the linux desktop.
Not that what they came up with was particularly good.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: