Fedora Stakeholders Have Been Debating Whether To Retire GlusterFS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67050

    Fedora Stakeholders Have Been Debating Whether To Retire GlusterFS

    Phoronix: Fedora Stakeholders Have Been Debating Whether To Retire GlusterFS

    A discussion that originally started last summer has been reignited: whether it's time to retire GlusterFS within Fedora Linux. But following discussions in recent days, there may be a new packager willing to take over but it doesn't change the fact of declining upstream activity around GlusterFS...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • mb_q
    Senior Member
    • May 2017
    • 221

    #2
    This was likely for like 10 years during which RedHat had both Gluster and Ceph. Gluster's composable layers were definitely a more clever solution, but Ceph just delivers what enterprise people want. Hobby data hoarders will still have MooseFS.

    Comment

    • EphemeralEft
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2022
      • 337

      #3
      I hope they kill it. My employer uses Gluster on RHEL with an MSP and I’ve been trying to switch them to PNFS for a while. We already use NFS everywhere and it’s free.

      Comment

      • Kemosabe
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2013
        • 694

        #4
        Originally posted by EphemeralEft View Post
        I hope they kill it. My employer uses Gluster on RHEL with an MSP and I’ve been trying to switch them to PNFS for a while. We already use NFS everywhere and it’s free.
        Oh yeah, NFS! Great that it's free! No problem that it sucks badly!

        Comment

        • pWe00Iri3e7Z9lHOX2Qx
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2020
          • 1469

          #5
          Meanwhile Ceph might have more commits in the first 6 days of 2025 than GlusterFS had in all of 2024 (on my phone so it's hard to play with the commit graph).

          Comment

          • slalomsk8er
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2010
            • 359

            #6
            From the comments, I gather that it's not just a mature and finished solution that requires just maintenance, but its niche is closing, and it will be history soon.
            As I just in the last weeks stumbled over its website and thought it looks interesting, is kind of sad.

            Comment

            • pWe00Iri3e7Z9lHOX2Qx
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2020
              • 1469

              #7
              Originally posted by mb_q View Post
              This was likely for like 10 years during which RedHat had both Gluster and Ceph. Gluster's composable layers were definitely a more clever solution, but Ceph just delivers what enterprise people want. Hobby data hoarders will still have MooseFS.
              Even hobby data hoarders can use Ceph on Proxmox. Ooh there was some s3 compatible distributed object storage FS I was looking at the other day that seemed neat, MinIO.

              Comment

              • zexelon
                Senior Member
                • May 2019
                • 731

                #8
                This is really disappointing! GlusterFS works really well in clustered file system space where it has enough performance to be usable at scale without the need for a Phd to assemble like Ceph requires.

                Comment

                • aorth
                  Phoronix Member
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 52

                  #9
                  I've been managing a small Gluster storage cluster for ten years and I've seen the writing on the wall for some time (reduced mailing list activity, slowed release cadence, etc). For the last few years I've prioritized other stuff at work and the storage cluster has been on autopilot. This is going to be a lot of work and money for me to migrate to something else. Dreading it...

                  Comment

                  • Britoid
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2013
                    • 2146

                    #10
                    Replaced a GlusterFS cluster with a JuiceFS one, given object storage is dirt cheap reduced the total costs by around 80%.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X