Ubuntu 25.04 "Plucky Puffin" Development Opens - Defaulting To -O3 Optimizations

[F.Ultra]

Why are you so deceitful? What are you trying to do? I tell you again that Ubuntu allows remote access to the desktop. if this was allowed over ssh, then this is still a small problem. but you proved that clietn-server is not installed, so they provide remote access to the desktop by default through other holes. What else do you need to prove? I repeat for you once again, openssh-client is installed, remote access to the desktop is allowed by default. you swore to me that the ports were all closed, that it was impossible. how is this not possible if remote access on the desktop is allowed by default? It's not just a hole, it's a betrayal. You realize that.

Because you continue to write lies after lies and refuses to listen to when I and others are trying to tell you things. Now all of a sudden you have changed your story as well to be from Ubuntu opening port 22 (which is sshd) to it being about remote desktop when you found out that port 22 wasn't opened by default.

If you really are talking about the gnome desktop sharing then why on earth did you start by talking about port 22, gnome desktop-sharing runs on port 3389 and it is not enabled by default as you could see from my previous screen shot. Again, if you have to enable something, IT IS NOT THE DEFAULT.

[F.Ultra]

Let's take it in order. show me the openssh-client is installed?Let's take it in order. show me the openssh-client is installed?

what are you even talking about, no one have mentioned the ssh client before. Yes the ssh client is installed by default, but so what? It does not listen to remote connections, it is only used to create external connections, it is a client, not a server.

[F.Ultra]

rats, openssh-server and openssh-client share libraries and packages. you said that snap is not related to openssh, I deleted openssh and deleted snap. there is an addiction.

lots of applications share libraries, so what? And no neither the openssh-client nor the openssh-server packages exists as snaps, I just showed you that in another post with the output from apt-cache.

[F.Ultra]

Moron, what are you talking about? I said that when installing Ubuntu, the ports are open by default. I was told that this was not the case. that openssh-server should be installed. I said that openssh-server is installed because openssh-client is installed, because they have common packages and snap depends on them. I was told that snap does not depend on openssh. I deleted the openssh-client and deleted snap. Let's see what I did wrong? some versions of Ubuntu allow remote desktop access by default. open ports are used for this purpose. I'm right about that. and this is a hole deliberately dug by assholes like you. A criminal case should be opened against you. and so, the ports are open, on the destope. ssh is installed. but the worst thing is that a lot of developers are silent about it, or maybe they don't even know. I'm just a simple user. Linus kicked out the wrong people. Instead of the Russians, you should have been kicked out.

That is not at all what you said. You said that the openssh packages where installed as snaps (they are not). You claimed that port 22 was opened by default (it is not). You also now claim that remote desktop is enabled by default (it is not).

In a previous screen show I showed you which ports are opened in a fresh default install of Ubuntu 24.04, note the absence of both port 22 and the remote desktop port (3389) from that list. If you machine lists that an application is listening on port 22 and/or 3389 then you have manually installed and enabled that, it is not the default.

By all means open a criminal case against me, that would be extremely fun to watch that wreck explode in your face. Cheesus you are delirious.

edit: Here is the official documentation for how to enable desktop sharing : https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubunt...esktop.html.ro strange how they have to tell you to enable something if it was enabled by default right??

[F.Ultra]

openssh-server and openssh-client have and use a common OpenSSH library, which is responsible for implementing SSH protocols. and this is set by default on the desktop.

no they don't. Also the sole reason the snapd package have a requirement on openssh-client is because snap needs access to the ssh-keygen application in case it have to install snaps that needs to read the local ssh keys. And again, this is not a problem, the ssh client is for connecting out not in.

[F.Ultra]

Why are you trying to convince me of what I see with my own eyes? The check mark is set by default and allows remote access to the desktop on some versions of graphical shells. if this is news to you, then run away into the distance. for so long, the ubuntu developers have apparently come to their senses and fixed their shit. This couldn't last forever. someone would say that initially, after installation, access is open.

So which version then (tell me which and I will install it to check)? It is not done in 24.04 which is what I and others have showed you repeatedly. You do know that you made your initial comment on a thread dedicated to 25.04 right? Also your initial post talked about port 22 and that have never ever been opened by default since inception (I have used and installed every single version of Ubuntu since 4.10, the very first version).

[Tuxee]

I repeat to you rats ten times that you would better say that the remote access that Ubuntu allows by default was through a secure ssh server, but you animals started twisting something. ubuntu in its versions allows remote access to the desktop by default. and this is a hole, this is betrayal and there is no way to explain it.I repeat to you rats ten times that you would better say that the remote access that Ubuntu allows by default was through a secure ssh server, but you animals started twisting something. ubuntu in its versions allows remote access to the desktop by default. and this is a hole, this is betrayal and there is no way to explain it.I repeat to you rats ten times that you would better say that the remote access that Ubuntu allows by default was through a secure ssh server, but you animals started twisting something. ubuntu in its versions allows remote access to the desktop by default. and this is a hole, this is betrayal and there is no way to explain it.I repeat to you rats ten times that you would better say that the remote access that Ubuntu allows by default was through a secure ssh server, but you animals started twisting something. ubuntu in its versions allows remote access to the desktop by default. and this is a hole, this is betrayal and there is no way to explain it.

Son, have you forgotten about your meds? Again?

[royce]

This thread could've been avoided with a coat hanger.

[F.Ultra]

I tell you again that remote desktop access is open by default in some graphical shells. this also requires open ports. now they have apparently been quickly removed in new versions. I did not install ubuntu 24.

Again I ask in which version of Ubuntu?

you will at least install a common OpenSSH library

No such thing exists, so no you don't. You are most likely confusing this with libcrypto which is the OpenSSL library that contains implementations of crypto algorithms, pray tell what harm it did that this was installed on your system.

now about the open ports, they exist, because for remote access to the desktop, you need a port for the display. Why convince me otherwise? the ports are open, and this is done on purpose.

Your claim from your first post was that port 22 was open by default, and this is false. It took tons of comments before you changed your story to be about remote desktop instead. Can you understand why there might be some confusion in what you actually meant when you spent a couple of posts talking complete nonsense? Port 22 was important for the discussions since it is used by sshd, which is why the thread lead into the sshd territory.

[F.Ultra]

and what don't you know about remote desktop access? Maybe it's because you're old and you've forgotten what it was? I don't blame you. Anyway, guys, I really have things to do. I can't say that I'm glad to talk with you, but I'm learning a lot of new things, and I come to the conclusion that Linux distributions are very dangerous because they are developed by idiots.

It's not on be default on any of my systems and they are upgraded from a long lineage of versions, you still have not said which version enables this by default so we cannot check your claim.