Originally posted by Danny3
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Raspberry Pi OS Now Using Wayland By Default On All Models
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by NateHubbard View Post
Wouldn't they also require a ton more dependencies and memory usage though? Seems like the last thing you'd want on a low end device.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by Danny3 View PostI wish they had worked to improve the compositors of Plasma and Gnome to make sure these two most popular DEs work well on such low power devices!
I'm so tired of developers suffering from the NIH syndrome!
Meanwhile the Raspberry OS developers reuse the LXDE project and labwc, which is based on wlroots, wasn't initially started by the Raspberry OS developers, too.
Edit: I would like to see a updated Raspberry Pi OS Version for desktop computers, the most recent version is still more then 2 years old.Last edited by Julien Bear; 28 October 2024, 12:20 PM.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Incredible. The update killed the desktop for many users. Users who had installed from the July image got the new compositor. Users who had installed from an earlier image, even if they then ran every update after that, were switched to the new compositor even though it wasn't installed so on reboot they just got a black screen.
"Updates to a pre-July image wouldn't have helped in this case. The issue was that for testing purposes, we manually added labwc to the July image as part of the image creation process, but didn't make it a dependency of anything (so that people wouldn't get it on an update back then); we then failed to spot that that was the only mechanism by which it was being installed this time around, so pushed this release without adding it as a dependency. All of my testing was based on the July image, so I never saw the problem..." - https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewt...75fa2#p2263742
L O L
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alexmitter View Postlabwc is quite the excellent choice for the Pixel Desktop(Raspies LXDE continuation) and all for all it is still the better continuation of LXDE compared to the failure that is LXQt.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Julien Bear View PostThe problems are the maintainers of the Gnome project, who are resistant to user wishes.
Originally posted by Julien Bear View PostAnd I lost hope that Gnome 3+ would be more lightweight 10 years ago.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by kpedersen View PostMakes sense. An enterprise display system is overkill for these little consumer devices. Hobbyist / quick prototyping things are certainly better served with more direct pixel access, old MS-DOS style.
I guess it also helps funnel punters into Raspberry Pi's proprietary remote desktop system (Raspberry Pi Connect) since most UNIX VNC servers rely on X11 for session management. Proprietary viewers remind me of CarbonCopy for Windows 3.1 from the 90s. Progress is a funny thing.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alexmitter View PostThe goal was not to make a flimsy 2D desktop, the goal was to produce a fully GPU accellerated modern desktop interface that enables all the effects and eye candy people on other platforms were already getting AND do that all while being able to be scripted in realtime. That is, by design, heavier then a LXDE would ever be. But is that heavy in the context of today and todays hardware? Nah.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alexmitter View Post
"Gnome should look and work just like Windows" is not a valid user wish. As much as you seath about it, the people who do the work stear the project. And they don't want to build yet another windows clone.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment