Raspberry Pi OS Now Using Wayland By Default On All Models

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67061

    Raspberry Pi OS Now Using Wayland By Default On All Models

    Phoronix: Raspberry Pi OS Now Using Wayland By Default On All Models

    Over the past year we have seen Raspberry Pi working a lot on Wayland support for the Raspberry Pi OS desktop and using it on their latest Raspberry Pi models. With today's new Raspberry Pi OS update, Wayland is being used by default across all Raspberry Pi devices...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • Alexmitter
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2019
    • 1117

    #2
    labwc is quite the excellent choice for the Pixel Desktop(Raspies LXDE continuation) and all for all it is still the better continuation of LXDE compared to the failure that is LXQt.

    Comment

    • kpedersen
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 2672

      #3
      Makes sense. An enterprise display system is overkill for these little consumer devices. Hobbyist / quick prototyping things are certainly better served with more direct pixel access, old MS-DOS style.

      I guess it also helps funnel punters into Raspberry Pi's proprietary remote desktop system (Raspberry Pi Connect) since most UNIX VNC servers rely on X11 for session management. Proprietary viewers remind me of CarbonCopy for Windows 3.1 from the 90s. Progress is a funny thing.

      Comment

      • ezst036
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2018
        • 673

        #4
        A switch from X to Wayland ought to make it "feel" more responsive during use, so that is good. Especially on the lower-powered devices that are left to boot up into a GUI.

        Comment

        • pdbecid
          Junior Member
          • Jul 2020
          • 17

          #5
          Labwc is rock solid, used it for a while and served me well. Their development is steady and without drama, best solution for low spec hardware.

          Comment

          • reba
            Senior Member
            • May 2020
            • 671

            #6
            Wow, that's a for me unexpected success for labwc. Of course it makes sense to use it on a smaller and weaker platform, just as it is blazing along on my 16 core It is extremely solid for a now extended period of time and I use it daily without noticing anything bad in my face or in the logs.

            Congratulations! Well deserved. Also to wlroots as it's their foundation.

            Comment

            • davidbepo
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2014
              • 935

              #7
              sadge

              Comment

              • Vermilion
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2021
                • 243

                #8
                Originally posted by Alexmitter View Post
                [...] the Pixel Desktop(Raspies LXDE continuation)
                It hasn't been called Pixel for years now. It's just Raspberry Pi Desktop.

                Comment

                • ssokolow
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2013
                  • 5058

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Alexmitter View Post
                  labwc is quite the excellent choice for the Pixel Desktop(Raspies LXDE continuation) and all for all it is still the better continuation of LXDE compared to the failure that is LXQt.
                  It's probably also partly because, last time I looked into LXQt's Wayland plans, the LXDE/LXQt devs were exploring it as an option.

                  Comment

                  • Danny3
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2012
                    • 2307

                    #10
                    I wish they had worked to improve the compositors of Plasma and Gnome to make sure these two most popular DEs work well on such low power devices!
                    I'm so tired of developers suffering from the NIH syndrome!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X