Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Fastest AArch64 Linux Distribution On The 192-Core AmpereOne

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Fastest AArch64 Linux Distribution On The 192-Core AmpereOne

    Phoronix: The Fastest AArch64 Linux Distribution On The 192-Core AmpereOne

    When it comes to the question of the fastest x86_64 Linux distribution the answer is very easy with Intel's Clear Linux. But what about in the AArch64 world? When having the AmpereOne server in the lab curiosity got the best of me and I ran benchmarks across seven different Linux distributions on this Supermicro ARM server for seeing what platform had the fastest out-of-the-box Linux performance. The Linux distributions tested on this AmpereOne A192-32X server included Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, Ubuntu 24.10 daily, Fedora Server 40, AlmaLinux 9.4, openSUSE Tumbleweed, Debian Testing, and CentOS Stream 10.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    The test suite isn't exactly server-oriented, but it's still funny to see the only server distro in the pack finishing second to last.

    Comment


    • #3
      No Arch on Aarch?

      Comment


      • #4
        Would be interesting to know why Fedora is so much slower than CentOS Stream

        Comment


        • #5
          Interesting how many distros alternate between top 3 to bottom 3, sometimes by a significant margin. Seems there's a lot of optimization to do.

          Originally posted by 0badc0de View Post
          No Arch on Aarch?
          ALARM can be a a bit tricky to set up. I don't think there's any pre-made images for Ampere and perhaps the generic image isn't so easy to install, so I don't blame Michael for not bothering.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
            Interesting how many distros alternate between top 3 to bottom 3, sometimes by a significant margin. Seems there's a lot of optimization to do.


            ALARM can be a a bit tricky to set up. I don't think there's any pre-made images for Ampere and perhaps the generic image isn't so easy to install, so I don't blame Michael for not bothering.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by FluxTape View Post
              Would be interesting to know why Fedora is so much slower than CentOS Stream
              It is Server OS, they can optimise lot of stuffs by dropping support for old hardwares, Fedora can't

              Comment


              • #8
                I wonder how difficult it would be to install Win 11 ARM on this:



                This repo contains scripts and documents to create Windows 11 ISO and install Windows 11 on Ampere CPU based workstation. - AmpereComputing/Windows-11-On-Ampere


                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bug77 View Post
                  The test suite isn't exactly server-oriented, but it's still funny to see the only server distro in the pack finishing second to last.
                  CentOS Stream 10 in first place is definitely a server focused OS.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
                    Interesting how many distros alternate between top 3 to bottom 3, sometimes by a significant margin. Seems there's a lot of optimization to do.
                    Servers are tailored towards some types of workloads, Michael's suite has a lot of tests that more reflective of desktop or workstation usage.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X