Originally posted by hax0r
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Help finding a Distro
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Jaguar07 View PostArchlinux is a pain in the ASCII to install and set up. It reminds me of Slackware releases from 1994.
Once you get Archlinux installed and configured manually, it lacks a couple of features I really use a lot in other distros. Ability to log into KDE as root for example. Right click on desktop to get a menu including console or terminal windows for example, etc.
I do have to admit that with Archlinux, I obtained one of the best benchmarks for Apache-build there is. For everyday use it just is too time consuming to make the spoils worth the battle.
Your mileage will vary. It's just a matter of how much.
Leave a comment:
-
Archlinux - PITA
Archlinux is a pain in the ASCII to install and set up. It reminds me of Slackware releases from 1994.
Once you get Archlinux installed and configured manually, it lacks a couple of features I really use a lot in other distros. Ability to log into KDE as root for example. Right click on desktop to get a menu including console or terminal windows for example, etc.
I do have to admit that with Archlinux, I obtained one of the best benchmarks for Apache-build there is. For everyday use it just is too time consuming to make the spoils worth the battle.
Your mileage will vary. It's just a matter of how much.
Leave a comment:
-
Mandriva is excellent KDE4 and Gnome based distro as well, with intuitive package manager, easy setup and powerful system tools.
Leave a comment:
-
Slackware or openSuSE
Originally posted by cjr2k3 View PostNeed help finding a Distro... but I have some tricky requirements.
Need something that wont take a whole lot of trouble to set up and use (my GF uses this PC too). But I need something that is bleeding edge in terms of Development software (Eclipse, GCC, etc...). And (that's the tricky part) ATI Catalist MUST work (ATI HD4850) because I do play some games.
Between KDE and Gnome I prefer KDE but I use gnome too, so no problem here. As a package manager I'm very used to Debian APT. But as gnome vs KDE I can learn to use another package manager.
Any suggestions?
PS: Been using Ubuntu lately
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Kano View PostRolling releases are nice for some people, but it creates much more support effort than normal ones. When you closed some bugs new ones are found.
Leave a comment:
-
Trust me, this is the holy grail of GNU/Linux :
2009.08-1 archboot "Schmollie" ISO hybrid image and torrent
What you get is the rolling release distro and by far the most efficient, useful, speedy package manager out there. Also you should get the full blown GNOME DE with footprint of <100MB on i686 or ~130MB on x86_64.
Leave a comment:
-
niether arch or gentoo are particularly easy to set up.
i'd recomend chakra - ready to go arch linux with KDE-Mod and graphical installer.
you can install patched catalyst drivers that work with the newest kernels from one of several third party repositories (like arch-stuff) or from the AUR
Leave a comment:
-
Arch Linux with their rolling releases would have been a good choice if they had not purged the proprietary fglrx/Catalyst driver from their official repositories. Now it is just a second-class citizen.
Gentoo also has rolling releases, but it is not trivial (although straightforward) to install. And Gentoo makes it easy to mix stable and bleeding-edge packages.
From the comments I gather, it appears that AMD developers only care about three distros, namely RHEL, SLED and Ubuntu (which you already use). So if 3D is a priority, you may want to stick to one of those distros.
Leave a comment:
-
Try Arch Linux
Arch Linux has a rolling release system and fits your bleeding edge requirements. Read more about them on their website and wiki. You'll get the latest GCC and Eclipse as and when they release. With a little work you should be able to get your graphics set up as well.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: