Fedora Linux 39 To Be Released On Tuesday

[jacob]

It is:

rpm_vs_flatpak.png



This was helpful and lead me to this button, but alas, it does not fix the problem.

FWIW, I think this might be bug#234.

FWIW this is LO flatpak running on Fedora Silverblue:

image.png
So yes it might be a KDE specific problem. As a suggestion, you could get the rpm package's source, see if it has any specific patch or build options related to that, and then report them to the flatpak package maintainers.

[yump]

that is abolutely not true

It is:

rpm_vs_flatpak.png

IIRC the menu bars are invisible by default, you need to click on something (don't remember where) to enable them. Maybe the rpm build has them switched on in the default settings, but otherwise it should be the same.

This was helpful and lead me to this button, but alas, it does not fix the problem.

FWIW, I think this might be bug#234.

[jacob]

I tried to use flatpak LO, but unfortunately the menu bar menus (file, edit, etc.) are invisible in KDE. Possibly only when using the option to combine them into a hamburger menu. I thought I could work around it with the ribbon-style interface, but then I needed a plugin that added a menu item, and it didn't show up anywhere.

With how much of a hassle it is to port templates back and forth between rpm and flatpak LO, I'm going to wait a good long time before attempting to switch again.

IIRC the menu bars are invisible by default, you need to click on something (don't remember where) to enable them. Maybe the rpm build has them switched on in the default settings, but otherwise it should be the same.

[yump]

LO 7.6 is in flathub anyway.

I tried to use flatpak LO, but unfortunately the menu bar menus (file, edit, etc.) are invisible in KDE. Possibly only when using the option to combine them into a hamburger menu. I thought I could work around it with the ribbon-style interface, but then I needed a plugin that added a menu item, and it didn't show up anywhere.

With how much of a hassle it is to port templates back and forth between rpm and flatpak LO, I'm going to wait a good long time before attempting to switch again.

[schwarzman]

Too bad they don't release on Mondays, but now they miss the 20th anniversary of the Fedora Core 1 release by one day.

"off by one" - happens to me all the time at work :-)

[Lysius]

Too bad they don't release on Mondays, but now they miss the 20th anniversary of the Fedora Core 1 release by one day.

[NovenTheHero]

When was Fedora Core 4 released? Like in 2005?

Quick Google says March 2006. Been a long time since my Red Hat adventure days.

[danger]

Wow, haven't used Fedora since Fedora Core 4. Is dnf the new yum?

When was Fedora Core 4 released? Like in 2005?

[danger]

Dnf 5 isn't installed by default. ... Red Hat developers are no longer packaging it

Another disappointing move from Fedora. Fedora (and Red Hat) seems to be firmly on the downward spiral this year. One bad news after another.

[AdamW]

Please excuse me, but there is no release version of Fedora that cannot be delayed for a decade? I was using Linux for whole that time, but I can't find any version without delay

Fedora 38 was not delayed. It hit the earliest target date for Beta and Final.

We'd like to do that every time, but hey, stuff happens. Sometimes there are just a lot of bugs.