Originally posted by jacob
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fedora 38 Beta Released With Many Exciting Updates
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by mether; 15 March 2023, 07:55 AM.
-
Originally posted by RahulSundaram View Post
Only if you don't care about installing RPM packages which I do. If you prefer the Flatpak model, you can be using Fedora Silverblue instead which doesn't use traditional RPM packages at all.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Britoid View Post
I understand there’s known issues and working going on to resolve them, but I have never had an out of the box Fedora install where gnome software works as intended, or in a performant mannerLast edited by mether; 14 March 2023, 02:14 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RahulSundaram View Post
Only if you don't care about installing RPM packages which I do. If you prefer the Flatpak model, you can be using Fedora Silverblue instead which doesn't use traditional RPM packages at all.
I understand there’s known issues and working going on to resolve them, but I have never had an out of the box Fedora install where gnome software works as intended, or in a performant manner. Similar to the indicator problem (no support for them), can spend years discussing who’s fault it is, but ultimately they’re still issues with no resolution in sight.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CommunityMember View Post
I hate to throw facts into the mix (because that is so not the Phoronix forum standard), but F37 was delayed not because it was not ready, but due to a strong recommendation (by those that had access to the embargoed details) that an OpenSSL fix which had been initially categorized as critical should be included in the release. By the time the embargo was lifted, the categorization had been downgraded based on further analysis, but it was arguably the right decision by the Fedora project at the time.
Once it was delayed, a few additional fixes (and kernel uplift) were included, as they were already starting to roll out to previous Fedora releases.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Britoid View Post
Whether or not packagekit is to blame doesn't change the fact that if you go ahead and delete the packagekit GNOME Software plugin from Fedora right now, your GNOME Software experience will be so much better.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by _r00t- View Post
Fedora 37 was about to get released with kernel 5.19 but it was delayed as usual so they were decided to release it with kernel 6.0 (Freeze Exceptions).
Once it was delayed, a few additional fixes (and kernel uplift) were included, as they were already starting to roll out to previous Fedora releases.
- Likes 10
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RahulSundaram View Post
GNOME Software performance is unrelated to PackageKit (to confirm this, try pkcon on the command line or run some basic profiling) and the performance issues are being addressed elsewhere.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: