Linux Now Faster Than Windows 11 For Intel Core i9 12900K With Latest Kernel

[Azrael5]

By optimization, Linux Oses could be far better than windows oses also beyond ten times. The main matter is the way to implement the optimization in the easiest modality so to reduce the complexity. Clear linux continues to be the best Os among the linux Oses. This condition should arise from the ability of intel developers to make the Os CPu conformant to the CPu's instructions in order to get benefit from optimization. Obviously, hardware producers have such resources and above all knowledge to maximize the performance of their own software to their technological solutions.

[mitcoes]

I do not understand, why there is no arch based distribution in this kind of benchmarks, when the Steam survey shows that Manjaro + Arch are about 1/4 as much or more than deb based distributions. And in enterprise liGnux RPM distributions as SUSE and RedHat are the kings.

My suggestion is to add SUSE or RedHat, and Manjaro or Arch instead of other versions of Ubuntu when comparing MS WOS with GNU/Linux (liGnux), to be able to know more how liGnux perform vs MS WOS.

[Volta]

Thaks. I didn't know that Ubuntu has Apparmor enabled by default. Maybe that's why it's slower than Clear Linux.

It enabled by default, but AppArmor has rather tiny impact on performance. Ubuntu is using slower CPU governor: powersave, while ClearLinux is set to performance. Clear Linux has also additional optimizations. You can achieve this with Ubuntu, but you'll have to compile packages on your own.

[andyprough]

I do not understand, why there is no arch based distribution in this kind of benchmarks, when the Steam survey shows that Manjaro + Arch are about 1/4 as much or more than deb based distributions. And in enterprise liGnux RPM distributions as SUSE and RedHat are the kings.

My suggestion is to add SUSE or RedHat, and Manjaro or Arch instead of other versions of Ubuntu when comparing MS WOS with GNU/Linux (liGnux), to be able to know more how liGnux perform vs MS WOS.

Arch-based and rpm-based distros routinely lose multi-distro tests on Phoronix. What Michael should start doing again is throwing the latest and most prior versions of Debian into the tests, like adding Buster and Bullseye. Sometimes those showed fairly large wins in testing. It's harder to do though, since a lot of new hardware requires one of the latest kernels and a recent toolchain.

Using Clear in tests of desktop distros and OS's is kind of a meme, since nearly no one uses Clear as a desktop distro. Intel no longer even tries to support it as a desktop distro, and the last survey of Intel engineers showed that almost none of them were using it as a desktop distro. Clear is out of place in these competitions.

[edwaleni]

What a loser, I was writing the Linux kernel in 1962 before Linus stole it from me.

What are you, a 92 year old engineer from Bell Labs? Stand in line, there are few other Ma Bell retirees making the same claim.

[vb_linux]

Wow, Ubuntu 22.04 definitely sucks for using such an old kernel by default for the time when it will be released!
And thinking that is also full of snap crap it will probably be very hard to find a distro slower than that.

IBM employees attacking Ubuntu. So, 5.15 is a really old kernel, Wow!! If they release 5.16 and encounter bugs then these same accounts will attack them again.