Part of me understands very well how one would want an LTS release of an OS to consist of as many LTS components as possible, but this also demonstrates the uncomfortable split that Canonical seems to be in; they want a rock solid, stable OS on one side, but on the other they want to "make Ubuntu the best Linux desktop for gaming", which requires at the very least bleeding edge kernels and graphics support.
You can't have both at the same time, unless you are able to spend billions of $¥€ like Microsoft and Apple are doing. Canonical is simply not at that level, financially. Fast, stable, cheap. Choose two.
Perhaps a configuration option ( during installation or somewhere else ) to choose between Stability (LTS) or Performance (HWE) will have to be implemented at some point ?
You can't have both at the same time, unless you are able to spend billions of $¥€ like Microsoft and Apple are doing. Canonical is simply not at that level, financially. Fast, stable, cheap. Choose two.
Perhaps a configuration option ( during installation or somewhere else ) to choose between Stability (LTS) or Performance (HWE) will have to be implemented at some point ?
Comment