Originally posted by browseria
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
CentOS Stream 9 Builds Flowing, Opened Up For Contributors
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by tildearrow View Post
They should just call it RHentOS
The community's gone...
After the change bugs get reported, community is working on future features via SIGS and things are getting fixed.
It may not be precisely what you want, but the old model had no community - they had mostly either drifted away (such as co founder that is now doing Rocky) or become part of Red Hat. Users are not community.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by lethalwp View PostI want long term CentOs support or free RHEL for my productive servers.No-cost RHEL for small production workloads and customer development teams - Red Hat Customer PortalAccess Red Hat’s knowledge, guidance, and support through your subscription.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by browseria View Post
RHEL 9 alpha was branched from Fedora 34.
RHEL 8 was branched from Fedora 28.
RHEL 7 was branched from Fedora 19/20.
(see also: Wikipedia - Relationship_with_Fedora)
Diffing between those versions will get you a rough idea of what to expect, but only the Release Notes will be able to tell you for sure.
Comment
-
RHEL 9 may be branched from Fedora 34, but there is a horrendously long gap from the time of branching to the time it's finally declared stable enough for release.
If CentOS Stream can become something like a stablised Fedora -1 or Fedora -2, it'll be much more suited for workstations. As it is, Opensuse Leap is the only distribution that offer long lifespans while having reasonably modern and up-to-date packages at the point of release and for each point update.
Debian and Ubuntu LTS are resonably up-to-date at the time of release, but their subsequent point update usually offers little in the way of new stuff.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sonadow View PostRHEL 9 may be branched from Fedora 34, but there is a horrendously long gap from the time of branching to the time it's finally declared stable enough for release.
If CentOS Stream can become something like a stablised Fedora -1 or Fedora -2, it'll be much more suited for workstations. As it is, Opensuse Leap is the only distribution that offer long lifespans while having reasonably modern and up-to-date packages at the point of release and for each point update.
Debian and Ubuntu LTS are resonably up-to-date at the time of release, but their subsequent point update usually offers little in the way of new stuff.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sonadow View PostRHEL 9 may be branched from Fedora 34, but there is a horrendously long gap from the time of branching to the time it's finally declared stable enough for release.
If CentOS Stream can become something like a stablised Fedora -1 or Fedora -2, it'll be much more suited for workstations. As it is, Opensuse Leap is the only distribution that offer long lifespans while having reasonably modern and up-to-date packages at the point of release and for each point update.
Debian and Ubuntu LTS are resonably up-to-date at the time of release, but their subsequent point update usually offers little in the way of new stuff.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anvil View Post
thats what i thought, but Redhat wont leave it to long i assume untill its released, my guess they could release it late next year, as i gathered they wanted DNF5 in RHEL9
Comment
Comment