Originally posted by M@GOid
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canonical Releases "Ubuntu on Windows Community Preview"
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 2
-
Originally posted by Jumbotron View Post
Someone mentioned on an earlier thread that this is probably mainly for Azure devs and those who manage Ubuntu instances on Azure to test things out on their own Windows workstations before deploying.
On a side note though, I was revisiting the state of Flatpaks vs Snaps. I noticed again the old blurbs by Microsoft big wigs touting Snaps as the way to go in packaging and deploying Linux apps. Which struck me odd when I first read that even though Microsoft's embraced of Linux and particularly Ubuntu was already well known. Then I had a look yesterday at Flathub and the Snap Store. HOLY MOTHER OF PEARL JAM !! If the number of Flapaked apps compared to Snapped apps is any indication then Flapak is in DEEP TROUBLE !! It's not even close! There are LITERALLY hundreds more Linux apps that have been Snapped than Flatpaked. Just the number of games alone that have been Snapped vs Flatpaked is an order of magnitude greater at least! I wonder if Microsoft's acceptance and touting Snap has anything to do with this ??
FlatHub is a reference for flatpak packages, however Flatpak's policy, unlike Snap, is that you can choose whether to put your application in FlatHub or not, so many applications that are available as flatpak are not on FlatHub. W freedom!
Another point not to forget ... Canonical claims that Snap are universal packages but they are bad upstream and this is demonstrated by the fact that openSUSE which wanted to make Snap available, have not yet been able to do so due to some security bugs that Canonical does not have not even considered.
If you decide to make your packages available, you should at least collaborate with those who pose some problems and don't ignore it.
Nobody snubs Ubuntu is Ubuntu snubs others and they are bad upstream.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by lucrus View PostMicrosoft loves Linux... and Canonical loves Microsoft: that must be true, otherwise I don't understand the point of making a build just for WSL2. TBH, I don't even see the point of using any virtualized Linux on Windows.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
sn99
jacob
Keep in mind that I was talking about software distribution, not the distro people choose to use. When I say some have a childish behavior, I mean they behave like fanboys defending some distro and in their opinion, anything that is not like it is trash. Any self respect adult will not talk like that about Red Hat or Ubuntu distros. They just acknowledge it is not for them.
To clarify my position, I believe that if you want other people using your software, you should make it easily available for the majority of users, even if those users are in a distro you don't like. Because believe it or not, not every Linux user know how to compile from source, and some simply didn't have the patience to pursue every little dependency the dev forgot to put in the building doc.
I can see some developers just want to share something they think others might find useful, and put out the source in some distribution channel and forget about it. They don't bother with its adoption, which is perfectly understandable.
But I actually saw some programs that were meant to be adopted by a lot of people, but the developer just do packages for some obscure (in absolute numbers) distro and forget the rest. If you want to see your software to grow, that is not a smart move.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by anarki2 View PostThankfully it's not you making these decisions.
Originally posted by anarki2 View PostI'm very happy I don't have to fire up a VM
Originally posted by anarki2 View Postor reboot just to issue a couple of ansible commands.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charlie68 View Post
You are stating inaccuracies ...
FlatHub is a reference for flatpak packages, however Flatpak's policy, unlike Snap, is that you can choose whether to put your application in FlatHub or not, so many applications that are available as flatpak are not on FlatHub. W freedom!
Another point not to forget ... Canonical claims that Snap are universal packages but they are bad upstream and this is demonstrated by the fact that openSUSE which wanted to make Snap available, have not yet been able to do so due to some security bugs that Canonical does not have not even considered.
If you decide to make your packages available, you should at least collaborate with those who pose some problems and don't ignore it.
Nobody snubs Ubuntu is Ubuntu snubs others and they are bad upstream.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jumbotron View Post
This kind of geek elitist attitude is why Linux proper will never budge above 3-5 global desktop usage and no more than 1% usage on Steam. Who in the bloody fu**ing real world wants to hunt down a godamn app when they have been trained now for over a decade by Apple, Google and Microsoft to simply go to an "App Store"? Who gives a shit about freedom if I can't find the bloody fu**ing app quickly in order to use for my needs. I don't give a shit about your developer "freedom" when you take the freedom of you NOT wasting my time away from me by looking here and far for your crappy Flatpaked app on your obscure personal web site. You know who in Linux Land gives more of a shit for the end user. The one who has the best, most compatible desktop experience and a sane App store on top of the Gnome App store. Canonical with Ubuntu and the properly documented Snap package system and an actual Snap store stocked FULL of Snaps. And yet with all the resources of the combined Red Hat/IBM along with Red Hat being a MAJOR contributor to Gnome and the Flatpak group they STILL can't get their shit straight. SMH at the state of Linux and the wider arrogant Linux geek community.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
i realized what WSL was when i saw some windows "fan developers" on level1tech forums shilling hard for people to start developing for Linux on windows with WSL. that WSL was so great, installing Linux as your main OS was a "dumb" idea and prevents you from also easily using all these great Microsoft technologies. Highly discouraging native Linux use.
that made it pretty clear what the purpose of WSL is. its to get people off Linux and onto Windows for development. all of "Microsoft <3 Linux" has been one sided. sided directly for Windows. Very little love has been given to Linux.
I'll put it this way, do you see Microsoft contributing to Wine? do you see them porting anything over to Linux to improve Windows development on Linux? Like why not take the time and at least OPEN UP the direct X 12 api? improving Windows software on Linux? no one should be helping Microsoft make developing for Linux easier on Windows. its suicide.Last edited by fafreeman; 31 March 2021, 09:01 PM.
- Likes 8
Comment
-
Originally posted by fafreeman View Posti realized what WSL was when i saw some windows "fan developers" on level1tech forums shilling hard for people to start developing for Linux on windows with WSL. that WSL was so great, installing Linux as your main OS was a "dumb" idea and prevents you from also easily using all these great Microsoft technologies. Highly discouraging native Linux use.
that made it pretty clear what the purpose of WSL is. its to get people off Linux and onto Windows for development. all of "Microsoft <3 Linux" has been one sided. sided directly for Windows. Very little love has been given to Linux.
I'll put it this way, do you see Microsoft contributing to Wine? do you see them porting anything over to Linux to improve Windows development on Linux? improving Windows software on Linux? no one should be helping Microsoft make developing for Linux easier on Windows. its suicide.
- Likes 4
Comment
Comment