Great news. Thanks Debian project! ❤️
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Debian 11 Freeze Begins, Debian 12 Might Reduce Focus On i386 Support
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by DRanged View Post
Debian testing (bullseye) already has 5.10 kernel rolled out for abt. week or so. 5.10 kernel doesn't play ball with Virtualbox had to roll back to the latest 5. kernel.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by DRanged View Post
Debian testing (bullseye) already has 5.10 kernel rolled out for abt. week or so. 5.10 kernel doesn't play ball with Virtualbox had to roll back to the latest 5. kernel.
Comment
-
Originally posted by andyprough View PostBig jump for plasma from Debian 10 to Debian 11 - thanks to Norbert Preining's work to jumpstart plasma packaging, plasma version will be jumping all the way from 5.14.5 to 5.20.5. Here's what he told us in the MX forum today: https://forum.mxlinux.org/viewtopic....618183#p618183
I didn't mention KDE Neon because it's a special kind of distros.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anvil View Posthow is FlatPak ridiculous ?
I wouldn't call it ridiculous as much as I'd call it rough around the edges. At least then. After reading the 1.10 article and glancing the GH Issues it seems like most of my annoyances have been dealt with.
But it seems to be geared towards running modern 64-bit applications in the sandbox when a lot of people want to use it more like a Wine prefix for legacy programs or the mythical Linux standard library API when that's not really what FlatPak is.
JMB9 isn't wrong in that we need some way of running legacy programs; I always imagine something like Wine based on Debian releases instead of Windows releases that runs programs in sandbox like FlatPak....I mean, we are talking about a bunch of old ass legacy code that hasn't been updated in 20 some odd years; seems like the perfect candidates for sandboxing if you ask me.
Nice to see the great KDE support. Sucks that it happens to have happened when Qt pulled the biggest dick move they could pull. Seriously, what assholes decided that paid for LTS support was a good idea when free/stable is still basically in alpha? That's ridiculous. Are Qt and CentOS ran by the same committee?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by barti_ddu View Post
There is no virtualbox in testing currently, and the version from unstable works (I use it daily)
Been using the VirtualBox-6.1.16-140961-Linux_amd64.runLast edited by DRanged; 14 January 2021, 09:31 AM.
Comment
-
I've been running testing for a while. Running on brand new hardware -- ryzen5950/amd pro card. It's looking slick.
But broken docker. Broken KDE/docker interaction. Missing dependencies for slack and zoom clients. No chromium in repo. Hopefully these get worked out before the serious freezes.
These are all a bit rough if you use debian as a workstation and don't want to mess with all these things that just work in debian 10. It'll be interesting to see if a major release ships chromium free.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DRanged View Post
I use the Oracle repo. Will have a look at sid but don't like to mix testing and sid to much
Been using the VirtualBox-6.1.16-140961-Linux_amd64.run
Just lower Pin-Priority for unstable to not overwrite something unintentionally.
Code:$ apt-cache policy virtualbox virtualbox: Installed: 6.1.16-dfsg-6 Candidate: 6.1.16-dfsg-6 Version table: *** 6.1.16-dfsg-6 100 50 http://debian.balt.net/debian unstable/contrib amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Comment
-
Originally posted by extremesquared View PostI've been running testing for a while. Running on brand new hardware -- ryzen5950/amd pro card. It's looking slick.
But broken docker. Broken KDE/docker interaction. Missing dependencies for slack and zoom clients. No chromium in repo. Hopefully these get worked out before the serious freezes.
These are all a bit rough if you use debian as a workstation and don't want to mess with all these things that just work in debian 10. It'll be interesting to see if a major release ships chromium free.
Comment
Comment