Fedora 33 To Be Released Next Week

[phoronix]

Phoronix: Fedora 33 To Be Released Next Week

Fedora 33 will manage to ship on-time per its back-up target date of next week Tuesday...

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...a-33-Next-Week

[emblemparade]

Btrfs as the default is pretty cool for the future, but I imagine that most workstation/laptop users won't notice a difference (assuming they reinstall from scratch and use the default file system).

For my many Fedora installs, I'm going to stick to EXT4 for a while. I'm very happy to see that EXT4 continues to get a lot of attention and bug fixes and performance improvements in Linux. It's old but reliable and does what I need it to do. Btrfs features look great but I don't really need them in my day to day work.

Happy 33 upgrade to all Fedora users! Happy 20.10 upgrade to all Ubuntu users! Happy nothing-special-quotidian upgrade to all rolling release users!

Michael, looking forward to your 33 review and hope you focus on some of the little details that tend to get lost.

[flower]

I still see no reason to use btrfs and will stick to ext4

Performance? Well ext4 is better in nearly task
Fragmentation? Ext4 wins by a big and performance noticeable margin (eg firefox sqlite db)
Snapshots? Lvm
Dedup? Lvm
Raid? Lvm
Bitrot detection? Lvm (no corrections though, but well i have backups)
Compression? Btrfs is a winner. But i have enough space and my biggest files are not compressable anyway

Did i miss something? Or is btrfs just a solution without a problem

[Danniello]

For me btrfs is just great. You want to create "mistake protection" (snapshot: ) of 500GB catalogue with photos before starting some risky operation? Copy-paste in Nautilus - done in seconds.

Copy-On-Write is excellent idea

With btrfs is much easier to "protect" system before updates - I had couple situations that after `dnf update` in Fedora - something stopped working (problem with hardware not supported in Linux - nVidia of course). With btrfs snapshot before update - "rollback" could be done almost immediately. If I'm not mistaken OpenSUSE is doing it already automaticly.

[horizonbrave]

Did i miss something? Or is btrfs just a solution without a problem

You missed something big as a COW my big cocked friend.. don't forget that not having an extra computational layer (LVM) wouldn't be too bad as well...

[flower]

You missed something as a COW my big cocked friend.. don't forget that not having an extra computational layer (LVM) wouldn't be too bad as well...

extra computional layer are only bad for performance.

As ext4 outperforms btrfs i dont see your point.

[144Hz]

Thanks Red Hat. The Desktop lives!!!1

[horizonbrave]

extra computional layer are only bad for performance.

As ext4 outperforms btrfs i dont see your point.

It's a filesystem not sex with your girlfriend/boyfriend.. all this obsession for performance it's non-sense, unless we're talking about an abysmal difference!
Whatever turns your libido man

[cen1]

Fedora is getting their releases out so frequently and on time now that it stopped being exciting to upgrade. I say that in the most positive way.

[Britoid]

I still see no reason to use btrfs and will stick to ext4

Performance? Well ext4 is better in nearly task
Fragmentation? Ext4 wins by a big and performance noticeable margin (eg firefox sqlite db)
Snapshots? Lvm
Dedup? Lvm
Raid? Lvm
Bitrot detection? Lvm (no corrections though, but well i have backups)
Compression? Btrfs is a winner. But i have enough space and my biggest files are not compressable anyway

Did i miss something? Or is btrfs just a solution without a problem

LVM tools are horrible compared to how easy it is to use BTRFS tools.