Originally posted by Linuxxx
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pop!_OS 20.04 vs. Ubuntu 20.04 Linux Performance
Collapse
X
-
Michael according to https://openbenchmarking.org/result/...gm=y&obr_swl=y
somehow there is a typo I guess
PopOs 363.010 vs Ubuntu 357.149
Edit. the very last entry in the table not the plotLast edited by CochainComplex; 10 May 2020, 09:05 AM.
Comment
-
Linux is Linux is Linux. There's no faster or slower or done for gaming. If there's little changes they are well known tweaks any distribution can do and on all of them you can strip it down to a minimalist approach like arch.
Nice benchmark showing just that, next maybe Ubuntu Vs Ubuntu wsl2 Vs windows? Io should be considerably slower because butof the virtualization layer I wonder how much.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Royi View Post
So it makes even less sense. What caused the performance difference? I guess everything below 5% is the variance of the measurement. What about the IO?Last edited by CochainComplex; 10 May 2020, 09:05 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by andyprough View PostSorry, no clue whatever it is you are trying to troll me about.
I was not making any attempt at "trolling" you; merely making a comment about RMS. You need to check your paranoia at the door whenever you make comments on any forum...
Oh, and by the way: if you have "...no clue..." as to what my original comment was about--given the long and well-documented history of RMS--then you really should not be admitting that you have "...no clue...". By so doing you just lost all credibility regarding any knowledge of the subject.Last edited by danmcgrew; 10 May 2020, 11:18 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CochainComplex View Post
The STD is usually very low look at his overview.
Do you find it low?
Except for the IO thing which is resolved above, they should have, in a perfect testing, the same results.
Comment
-
Originally posted by danmcgrew View PostOh, and by the way: if you have "...no clue..." as to what my original comment was about--given the long and well-documented history of RMS--then you really should not be admitting that you have "...no clue...". By so doing you just lost all credibility regarding any knowledge of the subject.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by danmcgrew View Post
Well, if you can get past your combination of paranoia, "self-centered-ness", and desire to increase your number of totally irrelevant posts (your first one is not irrelevant but you just blew any semblance of objectivity...)--
I was not making any attempt at "trolling" you; merely making a comment about RMS. You need to check your paranoia at the door whenever you make comments on any forum...
Oh, and by the way: if you have "...no clue..." as to what my original comment was about--given the long and well-documented history of RMS--then you really should not be admitting that you have "...no clue...". By so doing you just lost all credibility regarding any knowledge of the subject.
Comment
Comment