Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pop!_OS 20.04 vs. Ubuntu 20.04 Linux Performance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Linuxxx View Post
    Disk Details
    Pop OS 20.04: NONE / errors=remount-ro,noatime,rw
    Ubuntu 20.04: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw
    If only lazytime were somehow added into the mix. At least I know the results from two out of three now.

    Comment


    • #22
      Michael
      Phoronix
      Michael Thx for the Benchmark!
      CochainComplex
      Senior Member
      Last edited by CochainComplex; 10 May 2020, 08:54 AM.

      Comment


      • #23
        Michael
        Phoronix
        Michael according to https://openbenchmarking.org/result/...gm=y&obr_swl=y

        somehow there is a typo I guess

        PopOs 363.010 vs Ubuntu 357.149

        Edit. the very last entry in the table not the plot
        CochainComplex
        Senior Member
        Last edited by CochainComplex; 10 May 2020, 09:05 AM.

        Comment


        • #24
          Linux is Linux is Linux. There's no faster or slower or done for gaming. If there's little changes they are well known tweaks any distribution can do and on all of them you can strip it down to a minimalist approach like arch.

          Nice benchmark showing just that, next maybe Ubuntu Vs Ubuntu wsl2 Vs windows? Io should be considerably slower because butof the virtualization layer I wonder how much.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Royi View Post

            So it makes even less sense. What caused the performance difference? I guess everything below 5% is the variance of the measurement. What about the IO?
            The STD is usually very low look at his overview.
            CochainComplex
            Senior Member
            Last edited by CochainComplex; 10 May 2020, 09:05 AM.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by andyprough View Post
              Sorry, no clue whatever it is you are trying to troll me about.
              Well, if you can get past your combination of paranoia, "self-centered-ness", and desire to increase your number of totally irrelevant posts (your first one is not irrelevant but you just blew any semblance of objectivity...)--

              I was not making any attempt at "trolling" you; merely making a comment about RMS. You need to check your paranoia at the door whenever you make comments on any forum...

              Oh, and by the way: if you have "...no clue..." as to what my original comment was about--given the long and well-documented history of RMS--then you really should not be admitting that you have "...no clue...". By so doing you just lost all credibility regarding any knowledge of the subject.
              danmcgrew
              Senior Member
              Last edited by danmcgrew; 10 May 2020, 11:18 AM.

              Comment


              • #27
                Why is anyone using atime or relatime? Nothing really uses atime anyways and it gives bad performance, especially on cow filsystems.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by CochainComplex View Post

                  The STD is usually very low look at his overview.
                  Well, those are exactly the same system and they have performance difference sometimes about 5%.
                  Do you find it low?
                  Except for the IO thing which is resolved above, they should have, in a perfect testing, the same results.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by danmcgrew View Post
                    Oh, and by the way: if you have "...no clue..." as to what my original comment was about--given the long and well-documented history of RMS--then you really should not be admitting that you have "...no clue...". By so doing you just lost all credibility regarding any knowledge of the subject.
                    tl;dr, another angry misguided sjw ranting at his computer screen from his parents basement, yawn.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by danmcgrew View Post

                      Well, if you can get past your combination of paranoia, "self-centered-ness", and desire to increase your number of totally irrelevant posts (your first one is not irrelevant but you just blew any semblance of objectivity...)--

                      I was not making any attempt at "trolling" you; merely making a comment about RMS. You need to check your paranoia at the door whenever you make comments on any forum...

                      Oh, and by the way: if you have "...no clue..." as to what my original comment was about--given the long and well-documented history of RMS--then you really should not be admitting that you have "...no clue...". By so doing you just lost all credibility regarding any knowledge of the subject.
                      Both of your troll posts on this topic are indecipherable. I don't know what's in your mind to think that I am paranoid about something, or that saying that would somehow get a rise out of me.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X