Originally posted by Royi
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pop!_OS 20.04 vs. Ubuntu 20.04 Linux Performance
Collapse
X
-
Michael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
- Likes 3
-
Originally posted by Michael View Post
The scheduler is shown on the system tables in PTS articles... In this case, "none" for both.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Royi View Post
So it makes even less sense. What caused the performance difference? I guess everything below 5% is the variance of the measurement. What about the IO?
Disk Details
Pop OS 20.04: NONE / errors=remount-ro,noatime,rw
Ubuntu 20.04: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw
Disk Details
Pop OS 20.04: NONE / errors=remount-ro,noatime,rw
Ubuntu 20.04: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw
And so the mystery was solved...
P.S.:
One day, I might not be here anymore, and who on earth will then spoon-feed you, my fellow Linux comrades, I wonder?
- Likes 17
Comment
-
A more sensible comparison might be to include two RPM-based operating systems that favor gaming, and are also widely used & supported. Fedora 32 has a gaming version, and is the official test branch for the Red Hat system of operating systems, similar to Ubuntu in relation to Debian.
The other updated & popular gaming system is PCLinuxOS, based from Mandriva's version of RPM. This very family centered version of Linux has the best range & organization of free ware & educational games in any operating system. It also has designed in the immediate access to the very latest official Linux kernel, better than any other Linux operating system.
PCLinuxOS has seven different Desktop Environments, but none are GNOME.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Linuxxx View Post
I don't know why Michael didn't bother to mention it, since his own software is telling him (and everyone else for that matter, too) where the difference in I/O is actually coming from; here, let me spill or even spit it out for you guys:
Notice something? If not, let's make it even more clear:
The first time any new file is created, Ubuntu will still write the access-time (atime), whereas Pop!-OS (whoever came up with that name?) simply will not bother itself with these kind of operations!
And so the mystery was solved...
P.S.:
One day, I might not be here anymore, and who on earth will then spoon-feed you, my fellow Linux comrades, I wonder?
The problem with this site is the policy of quantity over quality.
Most of the time the testing methodology doesn't make sense (Comparing different OS's and using different version of GCC and compilation flags) and each time there is no analysis of why we have those results.
At first glance someone would think there is something really improved with Pop!-OS while in fast it is a simple configuration.
- Likes 3
Comment
Comment