come to the dark side...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A New Desktop Theme Is Coming For Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by muncrief View Post
No, but if someone wants it I'll take the time to put it online somehow. I've just never had a request for it, and don't have a github account or anything like that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boxie View Post
As a proponent of dark modes - I find that where it is not an option is annoying
I will say though that it does take a little time to get used to it.
I've experimented with dark modes since they first existed in Windows 95 (think it was called 'High Contrast'?) up till today and I can only tolerate them for a few months, maximum. After that it's back to the standard light themes with white backgrounds and black text.
I don't understand the fascination with dark themes. 'Better on the eyes' does not apply here, if I was really concerned I will get a pair of spectacles with the anti-blue filters.
Comment
-
I'm using Arc darker. Another dark theme advocate.
In Nautilus though I prefer the main panel (with the files) to be white for legibility while keeping the titlebar and folder locations/favourites (left bar) dark. Otherwise it's too much darkness. Arc does that, so no matter for concerns here.
Anyway, on the new Yaru theme, I actually like it. Maybe not to the point of using it but it definitely looks more professional that what we are accustomed to in Linux in general.
To attract newcomers, it already looks more serious and refined than the amateurish/garage-hacked Adwaita theme it's based on (as showcased in Fedora).
Could still work on improvements though. The small frames (around search, menu, back/forward...) in the titlebar should be gotten rid of. It would look cleaner and more appealing without these lines, and consistent with the controls.Last edited by Mez'; 15 January 2020, 02:32 AM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sonadow View Post
It's not about getting used. It's just disorienting.
I've experimented with dark modes since they first existed in Windows 95 (think it was called 'High Contrast'?) up till today and I can only tolerate them for a few months, maximum. After that it's back to the standard light themes with white backgrounds and black text.
I don't understand the fascination with dark themes. 'Better on the eyes' does not apply here, if I was really concerned I will get a pair of spectacles with the anti-blue filters.
But horses for courses. We are fortunate that currently not everyone is forced to use the same thing.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sonadow View Post
It's not about getting used. It's just disorienting.
I've experimented with dark modes since they first existed in Windows 95 (think it was called 'High Contrast'?) up till today and I can only tolerate them for a few months, maximum. After that it's back to the standard light themes with white backgrounds and black text.
I don't understand the fascination with dark themes. 'Better on the eyes' does not apply here, if I was really concerned I will get a pair of spectacles with the anti-blue filters.
but I guess if they are not for you - they are just not for you. It seems like you have given them a red hot go and come out the other side without being impressed. For that I applaud you!
Maybe the mixed ubuntu dark/light mode mentioned in the article might be for you?
anyway - good luck!
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by muncrief View PostSo unless customization is destroyed by the mystifying move towards client side decoration I say more power to Ubuntu continuing their historic ugliness. But if client side decoration does become a reality, and users are forced to live with whatever painful color scheme others command, then I would actually move to Windows, or anything that didn't hurt me aesthetically. I simply can't stare at ugliness all day. I just can't.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment