Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arch Linux's Pacman 5.2 Released - Drops Support For Delta Packages, Adds Zstd Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Arch Linux's Pacman 5.2 Released - Drops Support For Delta Packages, Adds Zstd Support

    Phoronix: Arch Linux's Pacman 5.2 Released - Drops Support For Delta Packages, Adds Zstd Support

    The Pacman 5.2 package manager for Arch Linux systems is now available with a variety of changes over earlier releases...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Imo bad news. For example Delta RPM still is used in Fedora and works like charms

    Comment


    • #3
      It's not a matter if it works or not, it was never fully supported on Arch and as the article says, it had a security hole. It did work though

      Comment


      • #4
        Not landed in the repos yet...

        Comment


        • #5
          Zstd support seems to be a nice feature... I wonder if there are difference notable in update process!

          Comment


          • #6
            Great to see the development momentum with Arch Linux.

            Arch Linux is the best Linux!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by armetuz View Post
              Great to see the development momentum with Arch Linux.

              Arch Linux is the best Linux!
              Best really depends on use-case.
              While Arch might best at some thing, it surely isn't the best at all things!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by nomadewolf View Post

                Best really depends on use-case.
                While Arch might best at some thing, it surely isn't the best at all things!
                Agree. I love Arch for my desktop. But I wouldn't put it on my server. My desktop has been borked probably 3-4 times over the last 5 years from incorrect Arch updates. I can deal with it on a desktop, as I can roll back packages calmly. I can't deal with it on my servers. That's never happened to me on CentOS.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by SyXbiT View Post

                  Agree. I love Arch for my desktop. But I wouldn't put it on my server. My desktop has been borked probably 3-4 times over the last 5 years from incorrect Arch updates. I can deal with it on a desktop, as I can roll back packages calmly. I can't deal with it on my servers. That's never happened to me on CentOS.
                  To me,

                  Best distro for developers - Fedora
                  Best distro for tinkerers - Arch
                  Best distro for servers - CentOS/RHEL
                  Best distro for iot, random things etc - Debian
                  Best distro for desktop - I don't think there really is one.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by smirky View Post
                    It's not a matter if it works or not, it was never fully supported on Arch and as the article says, it had a security hole. It did work though
                    Why not fix the security hole (if it has chance) instead of dropping the feature then? That's like if I were to demolish my house if it was dirty.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X