Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 Reaches General Availability

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 Reaches General Availability

    Phoronix: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 Reaches General Availability

    As we've been expecting, Red Hat just announced the general availability of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0...

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...L-8.0-Released

  • #2
    What about colonel availability?

    Comment


    • #3
      RHEL 8.0 Release Notes: https://access.redhat.com/documentat...se_notes/index

      Comment


      • #4
        hey Michael, it's time to upgrade the redhat logo in the news

        Comment


        • #5
          The enterprise users just got a better, faster, leaner desktop.

          Comment


          • #6
            The best Linux distro, bar none.

            Comment


            • #7
              Is it possible to use zfs with Red Hat Enterprise 8?
              ## VGA ##
              AMD: X1950XTX, HD3870, HD5870
              Intel: GMA45, HD3000 (Core i5 2500K)

              Comment


              • #8
                What's with everyone's fetish to use ancient software (Linux 4.18, really?) and keeping it up and running for way too many years? Linux has a stable release, and it's called stable for a reason.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by 144Hz View Post
                  The enterprise users just got a ..., leaner desktop.
                  I don't know about leaner... iso went from 4.2 gigs to 6.6 gigs. Gotta have a dual layer dvd to burn the iso now. And no, I can't use thumbdrives.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by DoMiNeLa10 View Post
                    What's with everyone's fetish to use ancient software (Linux 4.18, really?) and keeping it up and running for way too many years? Linux has a stable release, and it's called stable for a reason.
                    Clearly you've never had to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars due to that 15 min windows of service down-time caused when that out-of-tree kernel module that your storage depends on caused the cluster nodes to core dump after the upgrade, violating your SLA requirement stipulating 99.9975% uptime. When a few min of downtime costs more than you make in a year's salary, you do not just upgrade on a whim.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X