I definitely think Debian needs a lot of work to catch up with RPM based distros. It has historically been reliable but was later than competitors on sane multi-lib support and dependency resolution can be hit or miss. To throw a dart at openSUSE I do get tired of the "4 bad options" at any conflict. At least they give me the options though.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fedora 30 Is Performing Great - Intel Core i9 & AMD Threadripper Benchmarks
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by labyrinth153 View PostI definitely think Debian needs a lot of work to catch up with RPM based distros. It has historically been reliable but was later than competitors on sane multi-lib support and dependency resolution can be hit or miss. To throw a dart at openSUSE I do get tired of the "4 bad options" at any conflict. At least they give me the options though.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Yeah the only saving grace of Debian-based distros is the software library, cause APT/dpkg is utter shit. No wonder they're pushing Snap/Flatpak so hard.
Still, there's nothing I miss from the Fedora repos, stuff like icon/cursor packs and widget themes are better in the home dir anyway. OpenSUSE is a lot worse software-wise and the way Yast manages dependencies is absolutely fucking retarded.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by angrypie View PostYeah the only saving grace of Debian-based distros is the software library, cause APT/dpkg is utter shit. No wonder they're pushing Snap/Flatpak so hard.
Still, there's nothing I miss from the Fedora repos, stuff like icon/cursor packs and widget themes are better in the home dir anyway. OpenSUSE is a lot worse software-wise and the way Yast manages dependencies is absolutely fucking retarded.
Comment
-
Originally posted by debianxfce View Post
Debian has most of the software packages, over 51K. Debian has most fast servers around the world. Apt/dpkg is fastest way to distribute software reliably. Debian has the resources to dependencies to work. Debian is not pushing snap/flatpak. Ubuntu is not Debian.
Comment
-
while not fedora specific -- I have seen loads of issues as well when third party "trusted" repos are used. In this case with RHEL and EPEL.
YUM has long standing issues with extreme slowness, multilib errors, inabilities to update systems without "some work".
I did search also for the issues with DNF and that still seems to be the case if I recall it well enough (multilib).
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by andyprough View PostThese benchmarks look enticing. Might be worth trying again.
In the past, I found that the large number of needed packages missing from its repository meant that you had to go with 3rd party repositories or sources, and that those quickly led to broken dependencies. Probably the worst of the major distros at handling dependencies for anything from outside of its walled garden in my experience. An area where Debian really shines.
In fact, Manjaro, with the Arch repositories enabled, is the absolute best distro I have seen for finding software and getting it to work easily and the distro that finally made me leave Ubuntu behind.
Once you go Manjaro, who never go back.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment