Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fedora 28 Beta To Be Released Next Week

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fedora 28 Beta To Be Released Next Week

    Phoronix: Fedora 28 Beta To Be Released Next Week

    Last week Fedora 28's beta was delayed due to open blocker bugs but fortunately the developers managed to get the issues squared away...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    When was the last time fedora was released on time

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by GunpowaderGuy View Post
      When was the last time fedora was released on time
      Never has been afaik. but IMO your better off to wait for F29

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Anvil View Post

        Never has been afaik. but IMO your better off to wait for F29
        I will take the first distro that runs reliably on Ryzen Mobile! I thought Ubunutu was almost there but im still seeing Keyboard lock ups and an inability to recover from sleep. The two issues might be related - who knows.

        Fedora though seems to be off in snother world, it really doesnt seem to be supporting new hardware as well as Ubuntu.

        Comment


        • #5
          I am waiting for the Ryzen 2700 or 2700x releases with compatible motherboards. I am not after a toaster, but a cpu that runs at 45-50°C under normal load.
          I am not a gamer, and all I want is a 4k resolution video card that is open-source supported.
          I am also not keen to overpay for DDR4 memory.
          Overpriced gpus and overpriced ddr4 memory may be the reason that replacement desktop computers are not selling. Its a reason I am holding back on my upgrade.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Anvil View Post

            Never has been afaik. but IMO your better off to wait for F29
            Why? Is there something specific in F28 that is likely to cause problems for people?

            I did a netinstall in a VM a few weeks ago with MATE desktop and it is running great.
            Given that MATE 1.20 hasn't been packaged for Fedora 27, I can't wait to install F28 on my main system.

            Fedora haven't realised a seriously broken version since the early days of pulseaudio, systemd, and their anaconda rewrite (that was the worst!). Last few years have been quite good IMO.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by lsatenstein View Post
              I am waiting for the Ryzen 2700 or 2700x releases with compatible motherboards. I am not after a toaster, but a cpu that runs at 45-50°C under normal load.
              I am not a gamer, and all I want is a 4k resolution video card that is open-source supported.
              I am also not keen to overpay for DDR4 memory.
              Overpriced gpus and overpriced ddr4 memory may be the reason that replacement desktop computers are not selling. Its a reason I am holding back on my upgrade.
              Memory is Cheap IMO, its VideoCards that are Expensive.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by kevmif View Post

                Why? Is there something specific in F28 that is likely to cause problems for people?

                I did a netinstall in a VM a few weeks ago with MATE desktop and it is running great.
                Given that MATE 1.20 hasn't been packaged for Fedora 27, I can't wait to install F28 on my main system.

                Fedora haven't realised a seriously broken version since the early days of pulseaudio, systemd, and their anaconda rewrite (that was the worst!). Last few years have been quite good IMO.
                its just my opinion. what are the real benefits of jumping from F27 to F28? i dont really see any.. Mate 1.19 that was in F27 was actuallty an unfinished Mate 1.20

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by wizard69 View Post

                  I will take the first distro that runs reliably on Ryzen Mobile! I thought Ubunutu was almost there but im still seeing Keyboard lock ups and an inability to recover from sleep. The two issues might be related - who knows.

                  Fedora though seems to be off in snother world, it really doesnt seem to be supporting new hardware as well as Ubuntu.
                  While I am a Ubuntu on R5 1600 user, if I was building a Ryzen APU based system or planning on using an AMD GPU, I would probably reach for Open Suse:



                  In fact, I would go as far as to say that if you have an AMD based system and you can't get it to run reliably with Open Suse then you probably are not going to get it to run reliably with ANY Linux distro.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by GunpowaderGuy View Post
                    When was the last time fedora was released on time
                    "Last time" implies a first time. And I'm pretty sure Anvil's right... I've been using Fedora pretty much since the beginning, and I don't think they've ever actually hit a scheduled date.

                    Not that that really matters, of course... if the bi-annual release is a week or two late, it's not the end of the world. But it's been consistent enough to be a running joke after so many years...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X