Originally posted by Zucca
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Adobe Is Finally Ending Flash Support... In 2020
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by duby229 View Post
That's because RAM is not storage and storage is not CPU speed. I know it sounds awkward, but that's why.
The whole latency would be in reading storage and it's CPU speed.
The answer is, it's not really disk bandwidth constrained. Initializing the hardware takes time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GI_Jack View Post
but muh old newgrounds games. The only thing I ask for is support up to flash 10/11.
Well either they adapt to the new reality or be forgotten, the internet waits for no-one.
Again, leave it to be burried. With most sides using HTML5 video now, there is no real point to bring this back from the dead.Last edited by Duve; 07 August 2017, 02:47 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Zucca View PostOh no... I just realized: http://sieni.us ;(
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hi-Angel View PostWhat is there anyway? I am not motivated enough to install Flash player, so I just see a black background, a few links, and random text. For some reason they didn't even made a text "install flash player" if that's the problem.
Anyway. That site contains a collection of looping flash animations. Some of which are pretty famous.
Gnash shoud be able to run most of them...
Comment
-
An interesting fact: I was crawling for whether there are sites with bounties for implementation features into FOSS, and found this:
FTR: bounties are probably disfunctional already, because they all look very old, links are mostly dead, and the site don't even care to fix SSL errors. But it's still interesting to know that at some point somebody offered 30k$ for, well, not even making the flash replacement, but just converting GNASH into a plugin for FF.
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View Post
That's because RAM is not storage and storage is not CPU speed. I know it sounds awkward, but that's why.
EDIT: A lot of boot time is all the latency it takes for information to move around a systems memory hierarchy.
EDIT: If RAM was storage and storage was CPU speed, then you would never have to "load" anything There would be no start time. The whole latency would be in reading storage and it's CPU speed.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View Post
We can all thank split memory architectures for that. If applications ran from storage an it was the speed of the CPU, then you could have true instant on capability.
Comment
Comment