Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Qt Creator 4.3 IDE Officially Released

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Qt Creator 4.3 IDE Officially Released

    Phoronix: Qt Creator 4.3 IDE Officially Released

    Just a short time after issuing the Qt 5.9 release candidate, The Qt Company has now unveiled the final release of Qt Creator 4.3...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Typo:

    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    Qt Creator 4.3 is another significant update to this Qt/C++ focused integrated development enviornment.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by tildearrow View Post
      Typo:
      Thanks.
      Michael Larabel
      https://www.michaellarabel.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        Qt creator is a very decent C++ IDE. Only had two quirks with it so far over the years when developing desktop apps:
        -changes in UI would not end up in compiled binary, had to manually delete some cached files
        -you have to be careful with project paths because chances are that Build&Run functionality won't be able to find the binary to run, extremely annoying

        Haven't tested CMake integration yet but I should in the near future, time to ditch qmake.

        Comment


        • #5
          How does QML compare to GtkBuilder and XAML?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by cen1 View Post
            Qt creator is a very decent C++ IDE. Only had two quirks with it so far over the years when developing desktop apps:
            -changes in UI would not end up in compiled binary, had to manually delete some cached files
            -you have to be careful with project paths because chances are that Build&Run functionality won't be able to find the binary to run, extremely annoying

            Haven't tested CMake integration yet but I should in the near future, time to ditch qmake.
            Have you considered QBS?

            IIRC the QtCreator manual says CMake support is poor because it offers little to no support for IDEs.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by peppercats View Post

              Have you considered QBS?

              IIRC the QtCreator manual says CMake support is poor because it offers little to no support for IDEs.
              Thats changed with CMake 3.7, it now offers a Communication-Channel for IDEs, and QtCreator is AFAIK the first that support it.

              Btw, the qbsprojectmanager plugin doesnt compile under Debian Stretch (needs to be enabled with QBS_INSTALL_DIR=/usr).
              Not that I use this plugin but I tried to create a deb package and it fails because of this

              Comment


              • #8
                cmake integration is the most important milestone in this release

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by uid313 View Post
                  How does QML compare to GtkBuilder and XAML?
                  It's very different. QML is a complete programming language in which you can use arbitrary javascript expressions to do reactive data binding. It's more akin to Vue.js components or JSX.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by peppercats View Post

                    IIRC the QtCreator manual says CMake support is poor because it offers little to no support for IDEs.
                    It is not up to build systems to support IDEs, it is up to IDEs to support build systems. Nobody wants build systems that force them into using particular IDEs.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X