Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Look At The Exciting Features/Improvements Of GNOME 3.22

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Marionette
    replied
    Originally posted by oleid View Post
    strange, works for me @ radeon.
    what distro are you using ? maybe its a debian related bug

    Leave a comment:


  • oleid
    replied
    strange, works for me @ radeon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Marionette
    replied
    Originally posted by Zan Lynx View Post
    The screen flickering is likely to be an Intel driver bug actually.
    It's not because it was working fine with 4.6 then I upgraded mutter and the gates of hell opened. Also in the bug report there are users user that experience the issue with raedon and nvidia as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • SpyroRyder
    replied
    Originally posted by danielnez1 View Post
    Have they fixed the problems with some of their programs breaking due to web providers changing their APIs?
    That's not a particularly fixable problem, if the API goes dead then so would your program. The mapping tiles thing also came almost out of nowhere so there wasn't a good way they could plan around that

    Leave a comment:


  • danielnez1
    replied
    Have they fixed the problems with some of their programs breaking due to web providers changing their APIs?

    Leave a comment:


  • doom_Oo7
    replied
    Originally posted by cj.wijtmans View Post
    Plasma 5.8 doesnt even run on wayland at all. It doesnt support EGLStreams.
    The latest versions of Qt 5 does support EGLStreams so maybe it'll come...

    Leave a comment:


  • dragon321
    replied
    Originally posted by stikonas View Post
    Can it run Qt5 based application as wayland clients? Plasma 5.8 supports running GTK3 applications natively on Wayland.
    Yes, why not? I haven't got any problems with Qt5 apps in GNOME Wayland. Just run application with -platform wayland parameter. There is one problem: Window decoration is different than GTK3 or XWayland applications.

    Originally posted by cj.wijtmans View Post
    Plasma 5.8 doesnt even run on wayland at all. It doesnt support EGLStreams.
    Doesn't run on nVidia prioprietary driver. It works good on open source drivers. And not only Plasma, but all Wayland desktop environments (GNOME, KDE, Weston etc.) can't run on nVidia driver, because it hasn't got GBM implementation which is used by all Wayland compositors instead of EGLStreams. EGLStreams isn't mandatory for Wayland, you can use GBM too. Nobody support EGLStreams now.

    Leave a comment:


  • dragon321
    replied
    Originally posted by stikonas View Post
    Can it run Qt5 based application as wayland clients? Plasma 5.8 supports running GTK3 applications natively on Wayland.
    I haven't got any problems with that. Just run Qt5 app with -platform wayland parameter and it should works without problems. But window decorations are different than GTK or XWayland applications.

    Originally posted by cj.wijtmans View Post
    Plasma 5.8 doesnt even run on wayland at all. It doesnt support EGLStreams.
    Doesn't run on nVidia prioprietary driver. It works on open source drivers. EGLStreams isn't mandatory for Wayland, there are another way - GBM which is used by all Wayland compositors (GNOME, KDE, Weston etc.). Nobody support EGLStreams now, and that's why Plasma (and any other Wayland compositor) can't run on nVidia driver - it hasn't GBM implementation, but open source drivers has it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zan Lynx
    replied
    The screen flickering is likely to be an Intel driver bug actually.

    Leave a comment:


  • GraysonPeddie
    replied
    Originally posted by jakubo View Post
    Ad blocking sounds like a VERY sane default to me...
    Mine as well, but let me ask you a question: have you came across websites that tell you to disable adblocker? This happens occasionally, and I fully understand they need to protect their very bottom line by keeping adblockers completely out. With exception for Phoronix, it's not like I visit websites every day. If I have never been to a website but want to check them out to see what information they have that I wanted so I can make purchasing decisions and every single web publisher tells us we can't we adblockers anymore, I'd be happy to stay off the Internet for good.

    And then I have a thought: why not "view-fraud?" Just download an ad and hide it, right? Oh, wait! Here comes destructive malvertising for Windows/Mac users...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X