6-Way Winter 2014 Linux Distribution Comparison

[xeekei]

Arch is just unpatched upstream software. There's nothing about it that would make it inherently faster, except maybe being more up-to-date, most of the time. It makes Arch a good reference point though.

[dungeon]

Every distribution was at least once slowest or at least one fastest, so there is no clear winner

Winner for me is OpenSUSE , because it has much more slowest cases then any other has been fast and it is not even tested in all cases

[andyprough]

No that does not count! because I'm an Arch Fan!



Anyway Happy to see Arch doing well in those, It's my primary OS.

Haha - as long as you've got good reasoning...

[hadi]

Because leading in 4 out of 18 tests is "ownage"? By that kind of measure, how do you reconcile Ubuntu's 6 out of 18 performance?

No that does not count! because I'm an Arch Fan!



Anyway Happy to see Arch doing well in those, It's my primary OS.

[andyprough]

nice, Arch ownage.

Because leading in 4 out of 18 tests is "ownage"? By that kind of measure, how do you reconcile Ubuntu's 6 out of 18 performance?

[marceel]

nice, Arch ownage.

[phoronix]

Phoronix: 6-Way Winter 2014 Linux Distribution Comparison

With this week's launch of Fedora 21, here's a performance comparison of the new Fedora Linux release compared to the Arch-based Antergos rolling-release distribution, Debian GNU/Linux Jessie, openSUSE Tumbleweed, CentOS Linux 7, and Ubuntu 14.10.

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=21236