If this dev keeps up the pace and can bring similar quality to file manager (or even turn this into the file manager, combining file manager&terminal once and for all??) Where i see doom ahead on ubuntu's path, i only see shiny days for enlightenment.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Enlightenment's Terminal Brings In Fancy Features
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by raster View PostLimited time. Too many things to do. E's FM only got so much love in it because time has to be spent elsewhere. Some day it'll get more time invested. Sorry
Comment
-
Originally posted by raster View PostLimited time. Too many things to do. E's FM only got so much love in it because time has to be spent elsewhere. Some day it'll get more time invested. Sorry
There are just some things that the FM is missing to be OK for the joe average user.
Thanks for all the work.
Originally posted by RexilionPlease do not apologize, we really appreciate the work you and the others have put into this desktop environment. It's really nice. But why not go with PCManFM, or just use libfm for a a file manager? I find PCManFM to be quite stable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rexilion View PostPlease do not apologize, we really appreciate the work you and the others have put into this desktop environment. It's really nice. But why not go with PCManFM, or just use libfm for a a file manager? I find PCManFM to be quite stable.
Comment
-
For a fully-featured file manager
For a fully-featured file manager, tyls would need to support all these things. I think the interesting situation then becomes how to build applications that live in terminal output. Having crossover between interactivity & scriptability has some interesting unexplored area.
I've been hoping for years to write a "command-line" program where I can hand intelligent GUIs to users:
I can specify a UI XML (thinking Qt) and read from the UI or wait on a change.
Now, I'm stuck with a multi-threaded (for background work), Object-Oriented setup.
Comment
Comment