Originally posted by smitty3268
View Post
Amarok 2.7 Fixes 470+ Bugs, 15+ New Features
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by Staffan View PostI pretty much have the same experience. I used to love Amarok, but then they kept adding a ton of bloat, dependencies on ruby and databases and whatever so I lost interest. Today I just run mplayer in a shell window, that provides me with everything I want from a media player.
There's nothing wrong with that - many people like you only want a minimal player.
Amarok is not that kind of minimal player, and was never meant to be.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by TurbulentToothpick View PostI was once a proud user of Amarok 1.x back in the day. It was great.
Then, after the extreme success of KDE 4.0 (if you want to consider emulating Windows Vista as "success"), the KDE developers decided to re-write Amarok from scratch, and thus came the 2.0 release.
It was a pile of crap. The UI was re-designed for the worse. It crashed all the time and was buggier than a cheap NY motel mattress. Many features were removed.
The KDE developers handled the situation by covering their ears and deleting any critical postings on their message boards.
I assume it's all some kind of theme that OS developers want to have the largest user-base possible, by going after the few non-users left out there: The idiots who can't handle the complexity of a two-button mouse. Thus, we have stunning successes like KDE 4, Gnome 3, and Windows 8. Mac OSX, the most "friendly"/dumbed-down OS of them all has even somehow gotten even "friendlier"/dumber over the last few years with releases 10.7 and 10.8. It's like a big race to be "grandma's OS of choice".
I don't even know where I was going with all of this. I just know that they took a great product and then pulled a WinAmp3, and that makes me sad.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by TurbulentToothpick View PostThen, after the extreme success of KDE 4.0 (if you want to consider emulating Windows Vista as "success"), the KDE developers decided to re-write Amarok from scratch, and thus came the 2.0 release.
It was a pile of crap. The UI was re-designed for the worse. It crashed all the time and was buggier than a cheap NY motel mattress. Many features were removed.
The KDE developers handled the situation by covering their ears
The Amarok 2.0 release announcement clearly stated:
?It is important to note that Amarok 2.0 is a beginning, not an end. Because of the major changes required, not all features from the 1.4 are in Amarok 2. Many of these missing features, like queueing and filtering in the playlist, will return within a few releases. Other features, such as visualizations and support for portable media players, require improvements in the underlying KDE infrastructure. They will return as KDE4's support improves.?
Leave a comment:
-
-
I was once a proud user of Amarok 1.x back in the day. It was great.
Then, after the extreme success of KDE 4.0 (if you want to consider emulating Windows Vista as "success"), the KDE developers decided to re-write Amarok from scratch, and thus came the 2.0 release.
It was a pile of crap. The UI was re-designed for the worse. It crashed all the time and was buggier than a cheap NY motel mattress. Many features were removed.
The KDE developers handled the situation by covering their ears and deleting any critical postings on their message boards.
I assume it's all some kind of theme that OS developers want to have the largest user-base possible, by going after the few non-users left out there: The idiots who can't handle the complexity of a two-button mouse. Thus, we have stunning successes like KDE 4, Gnome 3, and Windows 8. Mac OSX, the most "friendly"/dumbed-down OS of them all has even somehow gotten even "friendlier"/dumber over the last few years with releases 10.7 and 10.8. It's like a big race to be "grandma's OS of choice".
I don't even know where I was going with all of this. I just know that they took a great product and then pulled a WinAmp3, and that makes me sad.Last edited by TurbulentToothpick; 21 January 2013, 06:04 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Awesomeness View PostDepending how he configured KWallet. If he set it up in a way that KWallet closes immediately then it obviously opens again when username and password have to be send again to the server?
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by GreatEmerald View PostNo clue about what you mean. The only thing that uses KWallet is custom addons, like the Last.fm scrobbler. But even that asks for the password only once...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by NomadDemon View Posthow about stupid dependency of kwallet? that turns on every 5 minutes and turn off ?
Leave a comment:
-
-
how about stupid dependency of kwallet? that turns on every 5 minutes and turn off ?
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by sabriah View PostYesterday I installed Amarok on a machine, but now with gstreamer as a beckend; a first for me. xine has been dropped and vlc doesn't support an equalizer.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment: