A KDE4 Operating System In Less Than 200MB

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • a user
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 301

    #11
    Originally posted by RealNC View Post
    And DWM is not faster than Windows 3.1.
    even gnome2 2d without effects is faster than win 3.1 de

    Comment

    • Rallos Zek
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2011
      • 338

      #12
      Originally posted by frign View Post
      Still not faster than DWM...

      It is on my system.

      Comment

      • boast
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 127

        #13
        Originally posted by BO$$ View Post
        Face it, KDE is a pig
        for computers from the 90's...

        Comment

        • Awesomeness
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 2154

          #14
          Originally posted by frign View Post
          It actually is, ignoring the fact that your example is complete nonsense.
          Did you really expect anything else from troll RealNC?

          Comment

          • tkmorris
            Junior Member
            • Apr 2010
            • 22

            #15
            Originally posted by frign View Post
            Still not faster than DWM...
            The only thing I would like is upstream to provide/move to xcb, it takes almost 1s before I can open a terminal from cold boot, which doesn't happen with outdated xcb patches/forks or monsterwm-xcb

            Maybe I could try solving it by mounting dwm with ramfs/tmpfs, but not probably since it's Xlib latency

            Comment

            Working...
            X