Originally posted by curaga
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GNOME's Epiphany Experiences A Facelift
Collapse
X
-
-
The possibility for snooping is side product of "predictive searching" which itself is undoubtably a feature. You mistakenly expect your own values to be unversal but even if we consider having such feature on by default to be "unacceptable" then so what? How does it make the browser any worse when it's turned off?
Should we let such irrelevant philosophical dissonance affect our choise of a browser?
Originally posted by Teho View PostAnd maybe most importantly what does this have to do with the topic?
You understand that Chromium is open source and it doesn't send any information to anyone as long as you don't use Google as search engine which then again does the same on any browser? Well not that matters as it has nothing to do with Webkit.
I agree the Chrome track is offtopic for Epiphany. Then again, so what?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Awesomeness View PostWell, then you'll be delighted to read this:
http://blogs.igalia.com/mario/2011/1...ys-ad-blocker/
Seems now with Epiphany 3.4 there will only be one show-stopper left that keeps me away. I wonder why there isn't even a third party solution that aims for browser independent bookmark and password sync, not to mention that an open standardization would be even better and allow us to choose a cloud-service and web-storage provider ourselves.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Maxim Levitsky View PostThanks the dear God that nether Chrome nor Firefox are owned by Gnome.
OTOH Firefox does not have an option to treat all cookies as session cookies and whitelist only specific domains for permanent storage.
Both seem like GNOME's ?We don't need option XY? attitude to me.
The only browser with a decent cookie manager I ever encountered was Camino for Mac?
Originally posted by puntarenas View PostLooks promising, but Epiphany lacks two must-have extensions:
2) elaborated AdBlocker
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by curaga View PostA snooping feature is enabled by default. Saying it can be disabled does not make the feature, or having it enabled by default, ok.
Leave a comment:
-
A snooping feature is enabled by default. Saying it can be disabled does not make the feature, or having it enabled by default, ok.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by curaga View PostWait, other browsers send your URLs you personally type in to google if you have it as a search engine? Name one.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Teho View PostYou understand that Chromium is open source and it doesn't send any information to anyone as long as you don't use Google as search engine which then again does the same on any browser? Well not that matters as it has nothing to do with Webkit.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: