Originally posted by BlackStar
View Post
Java SE 7 Finally Sees The Light Of Day
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by bug77 View PostYou can fork, but it won't do you any good. In order to be officially "Java compatible" you must also pass the Technology Compatibility Kit (TCK) and that is not free.
Now, the real question is what would happen if you forked Java and called your form Jabba (the Hutt), without making any compatibility claims. Would Oracle still go after you?
I seem to recall that's what happened to Google with Dalvik (which came from Apache Harmony, IIRC)?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Akka View PostIs a high performance interpreter to Python realistic without create incompatibility in the language with the regular interpreter? Most similar language has similar performance (or slower)?
However, compatibility is somewhat of a red herring. The new runtime would be targetted to mobile devices which are incompatible to desktop hardware by definition (no keyboard, no mouse, touch screens, lower memory, slower CPUs, battery considerations, new APIs for geo-location, multi-touch, etc etc etc). Desktop apps would need to be ported anyway, so this is not that much of a problem.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BlackStar View PostYeah, it's ugly how Java is released as free software but the TCK is not.
Now, the real question is what would happen if you forked Java and called your form Jabba (the Hutt), without making any compatibility claims. Would Oracle still go after you?
However. Lately, JBoss has been slow in getting their JavaEE certification, but still released new versions of JBossAS. Granted, they have already made a name for themselves and can afford to skip some certifications, but this could turn into a trend setter.
Personally, I'd like to see Java turn into an ISO standard, but such requests seem to be deleted on Oracle's site.
Comment
-
Comment