Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
LLVM Replaces libstdc++ Library With libc++
Collapse
X
-
clang is great for developers. GCC is great for users. Both are currently very valuable.
-
Originally posted by theoddone33 View PostSo it may be a hard thing to transition away from GCC, but clang has a higher upside. GCC will continue to get messier and harder to maintain while clang hopefully has a good 25 years before it accumulates that much cruft.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Yfrwlf View PostWhat's more fun though is trying to speculate on whether or not software would be further along than it is today had there never been any controlling laws to begin with. I believe it would be, since even if there were more attempts at keeping code closed, leaks of that code would bust everything open and the amount of source code circulating throughout the public would be much more advanced as everything could much more easily be built upon. Money would be generated purely by services and bounties (paid development sprints), what I believe will eventually be the future and most likely have to take place before it is finally realized that licensing laws deprive everyone of a better quality of life due to the needless wasteful money spent in courtrooms that it causes. At least until money itself is abolished.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View PostYou expect Clang to support (and be stable) on 20 architectures in 2 years?
However, in a couple of years it could be the case that when companies come up with new architectures (like the Cell, for instance) they base their compilers around LLVM instead of GCC, and I would love to see that happen.
I believe (perhaps incorrectly) that most of the work on GCC is done by engineers at companies like that, though. So it may be a hard thing to transition away from GCC, but clang has a higher upside. GCC will continue to get messier and harder to maintain while clang hopefully has a good 25 years before it accumulates that much cruft.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by theoddone33Clang is not there yet and LLVM is still playing catch up a little, but at this stage both projects are very promising. In 2 years I hope we're at the point where GCC can be ditched altogether and serve only as a relic of a time when it was OK to develop software that's extremely hard to maintain.
Or maybe you misunderstand the whole point of GCC?
Though I do agree that code maintainability is an issue, and one that is not easily addressed.
Originally posted by NoEffexI'm aware, but you missed my point.
I'll give him credit for starting Linux off, but my point was that his views on communism are flawed because Linux can be copied on demand, but physical items cannot.
Well, good for you, I guess. He showed that the Free Software model works very well for software, and it's not something that Novell or IBM or Intel or Microsoft would have done. Although they are paying developers today.
RMS forced them to pay developers to create Free Software (through the GPL). And that's quite an achievement.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Remco View PostIt should make things easier to manage, because everything is strictly modularized. Performance has historically been an issue, but there are no recent benchmarks. Performance is not always a deciding factor. A microkernel is particularly useful for environments where reliability matters. It's difficult to bring down a microkernel system, because a crash / infinite loop is localized to its module, which is then restarted. Plus, it's really small. If you have limited resources, it's a good fit, too.
However, realistically, it would be a huge amount of work to replace everything the Linux kernel does with another one. And the result would be slower. So without a good reason (like scalability in the hundreds of cores cpus that may be coming soon) I don't see it happening for a mainstream desktop OS.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kraftman View Post@NoEffex
I heard microkernel makes things even harder to do, more bloated and it works slower... Know a single, good microkernel?
Leave a comment:
-
@NoEffex
TBH with modern hardware I think a microkernel or a hybrid kernel would help keep things not so bloated, but that's just me (There's a LOT of room for improvising with micro/hybrid kernels).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NoEffex View PostGCC is awefully bloated. Any changes that want to happen tend to be rejected. Same with the Linux kernel. All good things must come to an end..
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: