Help Out Compiz By Testing Their 0.9 Version

[kraftman]

Yeah, Compiz must be like 40% slower now... because of C++.

According to some toolkit performance Compiz should be faster now.

[bwat47]

c++ is not necessarily slower than c...

[curaga]

But see how fast the C version crashes

[NeoBrain]

C++ ???
Bad move, I'll test mutter instead.

Yeah, Compiz must be like 40% slower now... because of C++.

[kernelOfTruth]

Thanks a lot !

You're da man !

hm,

I meant:

yeah, I'm sure that the community will come up with those pretty fast

[sylware]

C++ ???
Bad move, I'll test mutter instead.

[kernelOfTruth]

PPAs, Debs, RPMs, EBuilds etc are all coming soon. I believe there is already an Arch AUR. Currently, I am trying to get cpack to work so I can build rpms.

Thanks a lot !

You're da man !

[kernelOfTruth]

Instability.

for me it's much more stable, feature-rich and resource saving

(it's the only one offering the negative plugin so please make sure it also works with compiz 0.9x & fglrx / catalyst )

[deanjo]

Anyone knows what Compiz brings that KDE4.x doesn't? I haven't used Compiz since KDE 3.5.x.

Instability.

[SmSpillaz]

PPAs, Debs, RPMs, EBuilds etc are all coming soon. I believe there is already an Arch AUR. Currently, I am trying to get cpack to work so I can build rpms.