Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

KDE Software Compilation 4.3.4 Released

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • callegar
    replied
    Having said that, it really is rather stupid, except for clever cases like Okular, amaroK, or even Kaffeine. gEdit and KEdit are stupid as shit to me.[/QUOTE]

    The reason for the 'g' and the 'k' is simply that gnome and kde are not mutually exclusive, nor perfect replacements one for the other. One may want to have gnome applications in a kde system and kde application on a gnome system.
    - How to have both gEdit and kEdit in your system in an easy to remember way if you drop the g and the k?

    To solve your issue.
    - cd ~/bin; ln -s /usr/bin/kedit edit

    Leave a comment:


  • V!NCENT
    replied
    Originally posted by BlackStar View Post
    Which was all fine and dandy, until they went and said that apps should now include "KDE" to improve product perception.
    I actually like the entire K thing because I can then easily know if it's made for KDE/QT.

    But it doesn't matter because if you're on KDE4 then all apps are identified by their function and not their name. KDE itself is never displayed actually.

    For example:
    KDE Speencrunch = calculator
    K3B = CD & DVD burning
    Amarok = Audioplayer
    Etc, etc.

    So for average desktop users it doesn't even matter.

    I love KDE4. KDE3 was just a resource hog, but KDE4 is just so epic. It's like following Apples WWDC; each time they come up with new stuff that makes me think "Wow that's epic".

    Gnome is just boring. Flat out. It's a feature, I know. It's cut the crap and suit the average user. It's all solid and usability tested and nothing goes wrong and nothing is complicated. But if I would want that I would buy a Mac or use Windows.*

    * Just my opinion of course

    Leave a comment:


  • RealNC
    replied
    Originally posted by BlackStar View Post
    Gnome 2.28 + compiz + AWN/docky2/cairo-dock + gnome-do provide an UI ...
    ...that needs 1GB RAM after running for more than 6 hours and slows the system down to a crawl. That *comes* close to Vista/7 though, since those do this right from the start

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackStar
    replied
    Originally posted by V!NCENT View Post
    They have done that about two years ago
    Which was all fine and dandy, until they went and said that apps should now include "KDE" to improve product perception. Which means something like:

    KDE Raptor
    KDE Dolphin
    KDE Dragon Player
    KDE Speedcrunch
    KDE Marble
    KDE Phonon
    KDE Oxygen
    KDE Solid
    KDE Decibel
    KDE Sonnet
    KDE ThreadWeaver
    KDE Arts

    Nice, isn't it?

    Originally posted by bullext
    It's not shit, but I can only compare it to the UI of Windows 98 or Xp. It doesn't go further and is emberassing when compared to KDE4 and even Windows Vista/7.
    Please stop this, you are embarassing yourself.

    Gnome 2.28 + compiz + AWN/docky2/cairo-dock + gnome-do provide an UI superior to Vista and on par to Win7. The docks are not yet as mature as the Win7 taskbar, but gnome-do more than makes up for this defect. Gnome is much more configurable than Windows.

    Leave a comment:


  • V!NCENT
    replied
    Originally posted by Ant P. View Post
    If they're doing that, then maybe we can finally get them to drop the stupid "design app names around a specific letter" naming scheme!
    They have done that about two years ago

    Plasma, huh?

    Raptor
    Dolphin
    Dragon Player
    Speedcrunch
    Marble
    Phonon
    Oxygen
    Solid
    Decibel
    Sonnet
    ThreadWeaver
    Arts
    Last edited by V!NCENT; 12-02-2009, 12:05 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • kraftman
    replied
    Originally posted by benmoran View Post
    You have to be stupid if you think names have nothing to do with perception of a product.
    It's not so smart to not use some DE, because of apps names. Perception is another story. However, having such names is easier to avoid gtk dependencies. If there's a 'Kool' name such app usually base on QT

    Leave a comment:


  • benmoran
    replied
    Originally posted by bulletxt View Post
    You have to be stupid if one of the reasons you don't use KDE is for its app names.
    You have to be stupid if you think names have nothing to do with perception of a product.

    Leave a comment:


  • mugginz
    replied
    Originally posted by benmoran View Post
    Do developers actually think it's cool or something? Does anyone?
    I think you meant

    Do developers actually think it's Kool or something? Does anyone?

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Sixpack
    replied
    Originally posted by Ant P. View Post
    If they're doing that, then maybe we can finally get them to drop the stupid "design app names around a specific letter" naming scheme!

    Something that GNOME is way ahead of them on doing, BTW
    Erm, it's bigger than a KDE problem. Systemwide, how many Linux apps have the word "GNU" in the title, or begin with the letter "g"? GNOME stands for "GNU Object Model Environment". So technically, gnome is part of the very problem you're complaining about.

    Having said that, it really is rather stupid, except for clever cases like Okular, amaroK, or even Kaffeine. gEdit and KEdit are stupid as shit to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • kraftman
    replied
    Originally posted by RealNC View Post
    The new "name" sucks. But anyway, I'm not using it because of the name.
    Exactly :>

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X