OBS Studio 31.0 Released With New Features For Screen Recording & Screencasting

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67127

    OBS Studio 31.0 Released With New Features For Screen Recording & Screencasting

    Phoronix: OBS Studio 31.0 Released With New Features For Screen Recording & Screencasting

    OBS Studio 31.0 was released this evening as the newest feature update to this open-source, cross-platform software for live streaming and desktop screen recording purposes. OBS Studio remains a leading choice across operating systems for screen recording, game livestreaming, and similar purposes while the new v31.0 release tacks on even more features...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • GraysonPeddie
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 713

    #2
    Code:
    sudo pacman -Syu
    No new update for OBS Studio yet. Waiting for Arch to compile the latest build of OBS Studio. I'm still on 30.2 at the moment.

    Comment

    • Quackdoc
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2020
      • 4983

      #3
      Thankfully, I have found replacements for everything I needed OBS for, I do wish there was a good open source stream compositor alternative to OBS.

      OBS has a lot going for it, but the management and buggyness of OBS is really a massive nuisance to work around. OBS denied pipewire capture because it was a "hole punch around portals", saying any PR to add it would be denied effectively telling anyone who doesn't like/use portals to go screw off. Really hope we see an alternative to OBS that doesn't have really dumb managerial decisions holding back the software, in the meantime, best of luck to anyone who needs obs, hope it doesn't break on you until at least a good alternative is found.

      Comment

      • carguello2
        Phoronix Member
        • Oct 2023
        • 51

        #4
        Removed support for Ubuntu 22.04
        Huh, 22.04 is not that old to drop support for, 🤔
        I guess this only applies to their PPA anyway...

        Comment

        • Daktyl198
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2013
          • 1542

          #5
          Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
          Thankfully, I have found replacements for everything I needed OBS for, I do wish there was a good open source stream compositor alternative to OBS.

          OBS has a lot going for it, but the management and buggyness of OBS is really a massive nuisance to work around. OBS denied pipewire capture because it was a "hole punch around portals", saying any PR to add it would be denied effectively telling anyone who doesn't like/use portals to go screw off. Really hope we see an alternative to OBS that doesn't have really dumb managerial decisions holding back the software, in the meantime, best of luck to anyone who needs obs, hope it doesn't break on you until at least a good alternative is found.
          Never once had an issue with OBS breaking or crashing on me in thousands of hours of using it, though I don't load it down with plugins. Also, OBS added native Pipewire capture ages ago.

          Comment

          • Quackdoc
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2020
            • 4983

            #6
            Originally posted by Daktyl198 View Post
            Never once had an issue with OBS breaking or crashing on me in thousands of hours of using it, though I don't load it down with plugins. Also, OBS added native Pipewire capture ages ago.
            no, it's only via portals, you cant use pipewire directly, also lucky on it not breaking, it breaks way to often for me, even when using the flatpak

            Comment

            • woddy
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2023
              • 275

              #7
              For me OBS has always worked very well.

              Comment

              • ahrs
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2021
                • 552

                #8
                Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
                Thankfully, I have found replacements for everything I needed OBS for, I do wish there was a good open source stream compositor alternative to OBS.

                OBS has a lot going for it, but the management and buggyness of OBS is really a massive nuisance to work around. OBS denied pipewire capture because it was a "hole punch around portals", saying any PR to add it would be denied effectively telling anyone who doesn't like/use portals to go screw off. Really hope we see an alternative to OBS that doesn't have really dumb managerial decisions holding back the software, in the meantime, best of luck to anyone who needs obs, hope it doesn't break on you until at least a good alternative is found.
                Is there any reason why you couldn't make your own .so plugin to do this? Why does it have to go in upstream (although it'd be nice to have PipeWire support without needing Portals)? There's wlrobs which is a plugin for Wlroots compositors, maybe we need a pwobs plugin too:

                Comment

                • Quackdoc
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2020
                  • 4983

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ahrs View Post
                  Is there any reason why you couldn't make your own .so plugin to do this? Why does it have to go in upstream (although it'd be nice to have PipeWire support without needing Portals)? There's wlrobs which is a plugin for Wlroots compositors, maybe we need a pwobs plugin too:
                  https://hg.sr.ht/~scoopta/wlrobs
                  no, I mean I could also just use gstreamer plugin, but why would I want to invest into a program ecosystem that cares so little about it's users that it won't even let you expose functionality already 99% implemented?

                  Comment

                  • ahrs
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2021
                    • 552

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post

                    no, I mean I could also just use gstreamer plugin, but why would I want to invest into a program ecosystem that cares so little about it's users that it won't even let you expose functionality already 99% implemented?
                    You do have a point, it took them long enough to add support for portals in the first place. The Flatpak actually had support before it was even merged. I don't think Linux is their primary focus at all, not when most streamers use Windows. It doesn't really matter though if you can use plugins or GStreamer, etc, anyway though.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X