FLTK 1.4 Released With Wayland & HiDPI Display Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67130

    FLTK 1.4 Released With Wayland & HiDPI Display Support

    Phoronix: FLTK 1.4 Released With Wayland & HiDPI Display Support

    FLTK 1.4 is out as the newest version of the Fast Light Toolkit that has been around since the late 90's...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • uid313
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 6914

    #2
    Yuck, this one is ugly! Use GTK or Qt instead!

    What's next, they're bringing Motif to Wayland?

    Comment

    • mazumoto
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 188

      #3
      Now that's what I call a Scrollbar and a Button.
      Looks usable.

      Comment

      • mobadboy
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2024
        • 161

        #4
        ( ) Beautiful appearance
        ( ) Reasonable UX
        ( ) Kept up with remotely modern design philosophies
        (X) Extremely nostalgic
        (X) Assisting in the deprecation of Xorg in most situations

        they know what matters

        Comment

        • cutterjohn
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2009
          • 313

          #5
          holy crap! FLTK is still around... nice to see in a way... I guess...

          Comment

          • primary
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2023
            • 26

            #6
            that website.. my god I love it.

            Comment

            • Raka555
              Junior Member
              • Nov 2018
              • 674

              #7
              Originally posted by uid313 View Post
              Yuck, this one is ugly! Use GTK or Qt instead!

              What's next, they're bringing Motif to Wayland?
              The FL in FLTK stands for fast and light, things GTK and Qt are not ...
              But it remains to be seen how much of the "FL" it retains.

              Was going to say you should see Motif if you think this is ugly, but looks like you know

              Comment

              • mifritscher
                Phoronix Member
                • Jun 2016
                • 87

                #8
                I like the simple yet functional style. Esp. normal scrollbars (scrollbar do carry lot of information, e.g. "how much stuff and how much in relation to the screen size" - I really hate the tiny or even autohidding versions which spreads more and more) and Buttons which looks like - buttons! On more and more Toolkits you can not tell whether you can click on text or not.

                Comment

                • topolinik
                  Phoronix Member
                  • Jun 2020
                  • 62

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Raka555 View Post
                  The FL in FLTK stands for fast and light, things GTK and Qt are not ...
                  But it remains to be seen how much of the "FL" it retains.
                  Being a whole graphic toolkit packed into less than ten megabytes, chances are it still performs lean and reactive.

                  Comment

                  • eltomito
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2013
                    • 125

                    #10
                    Originally posted by uid313 View Post
                    Yuck, this one is ugly! Use GTK or Qt instead!
                    I use it for an industrial app that runs on Windows and Linux and it's so much less hassle and B.S. than GTK or Qt!
                    I worked on a GTK app some time ago and once it took me two days to figure out how to write a dynamic pointer cast to make a widget work.
                    Also, GTK makes you write everything in GTK. You have to derive pretty much all your types from their GObject, use their storage structures in order to be able to display the data, etc. so if you eventually want to move away from GTK, it means rewriting the whole program.
                    Qt is even worse in this way. You actually have to learn a whole new language (called Q) to even use it. And the bloat goes beyond any measure.
                    So unless I'm making an app that has to appeal to teenagers hooked on Anime, I'd go for FLTK instead of GTK or Qt any day.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X