GIMP 3.0 Enters String Freeze, Inching Closer To Release

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Slartifartblast
    replied
    I expect the Milky Way and Andromeda to collide (or maybe not according to recent research) before Gimp 3.0 arrives, but thanks for trying folks.

    Leave a comment:


  • rabcor
    replied
    Originally posted by shmerl View Post

    That's not the point. They simply don't want to add full time developers even if that was possible. As I said, it's not about not having resources but rather about lack of any interest in doing it. And I think it's bad for Gimp's users becasue taking a decade to implement this feature is insane.
    It's fine, all the sane Gimp users are now Krita users instead.

    Leave a comment:


  • 0badc0de
    replied
    Originally posted by Malsabku View Post
    GTK4 is Vulkan accelerated and therefore faster.
    Accelerating a basically static UI makes much less sense to me than accelerating the actual gfx-related computations.
    The move to gtk4 has been driven by some other reasoning, like modernization.
    IMHO.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anux
    replied
    Originally posted by Malsabku View Post
    GTK4 is Vulkan accelerated and therefore faster.
    Well I never had the feeling the Gimp UI was slow in any way and I use it on an 12 year old mobile CPU.

    Leave a comment:


  • 0badc0de
    replied
    Originally posted by Leinad View Post
    Who will arrive faster? Gimp 3 or Half Life 3?
    Half GIMP 3!
    Last edited by 0badc0de; 21 August 2024, 04:36 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Malsabku
    replied
    Originally posted by Anux View Post
    I'm not sure why so many are eager to get GTK 4, is there something that would benefit Gimp? The last GTK 3 LTS release is from last year and will be supported at least till GTK 5 comes out.
    GTK4 is Vulkan accelerated and therefore faster.

    Leave a comment:


  • Malsabku
    replied
    Originally posted by hyperchaotic View Post

    Perhaps but they have rewritten a lot of the old code interfacing with the UI and old custom widgets to use standard GTK stuff. Updating to new GTK versions should be a whole lot easier moving forward.
    Upgrading from GTK3 from GTK4 seems not easy in reality.

    All major DEs (Cinnamon, MATE, Xfce, Budgie, Unity) are stuck at GTK3. They haven't even started to touch GTK4. Even several GNOME core apps are still based on GTK3. More developers are leaving GTK instead of switching to GTK4 (PopOS/Cosmic OS, Budgie, Ubuntu). Next year GTK5 will be released and it will be a GNOME-only show.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anux
    replied
    I'm not sure why so many are eager to get GTK 4, is there something that would benefit Gimp? The last GTK 3 LTS release is from last year and will be supported at least till GTK 5 comes out.

    Originally posted by shmerl View Post
    Yes, that was part of it. I.e. I understand as "we don't need do things faster (i.e. have more developers) due to being popular / in demand from users to iterate faster, we are good moving as slow as we do". I think the other comment was about donated money sitting somewhere and not being used for actual development.
    Well that quote above just describes non commercial free software development, you need to be really fit in mental gymnastics to read this as "we don't want sponsors".
    And if it bothers you, collect money and pay a dev to work on GIMP.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperchaotic
    replied
    Originally posted by joaquinvacas View Post
    Nice, then GIMP 4 development will start and get released when GTK 6 is released
    Perhaps but they have rewritten a lot of the old code interfacing with the UI and old custom widgets to use standard GTK stuff. Updating to new GTK versions should be a whole lot easier moving forward.

    Leave a comment:


  • shmerl
    replied
    Originally posted by F.Ultra View Post
    And if that post is what triggered you then IMHO that post does not at all mean what you think it does. If it was any other comment instead that I somehow missed to read get the significance of, then please link it directly or quote it so we can at least have some form of idea where this is coming from.
    Yes, that was part of it. I.e. I understand as "we don't need do things faster (i.e. have more developers) due to being popular / in demand from users to iterate faster, we are good moving as slow as we do". I think the other comment was about donated money sitting somewhere and not being used for actual development.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X