Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GNOME Mutter 46.2 Rolls Out To Ubuntu 24.04 Users, Experimental VRR Remains Rough

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GNOME Mutter 46.2 Rolls Out To Ubuntu 24.04 Users, Experimental VRR Remains Rough

    Phoronix: GNOME Mutter 46.2 Rolls Out To Ubuntu 24.04 Users, Experimental VRR Remains Rough

    GNOME's Mutter 46.2-1ubuntu0.24.04.1 package was uploaded on Friday for Ubuntu 24.04 LTS users. This Mutter compositor update not only brings Mutter 46.2 changes to this current Ubuntu release but also pulls in all of the 46.1 upstream changes too...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Ubuntu will drag their feet on packaging 558.58 drivers though.

    Comment


    • #3
      As expected from Canonical they will throw all their LTS promises into trash just for GNOME. Without stability Ubuntu is useless as a distro since you can get much better GNOME experience in Fedora and much stable Ubuntu base in Mint.

      Comment


      • #4
        If you want to be a stable distribution, you can not use GNOME.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by V1tol View Post
          As expected from Canonical they will throw all their LTS promises into trash just for GNOME. Without stability Ubuntu is useless as a distro since you can get much better GNOME experience in Fedora and much stable Ubuntu base in Mint.
          Originally posted by hf_139 View Post
          If you want to be a stable distribution, you can not use GNOME.
          Have you read the article? There are no stability issues at all. VRR is still experimental and can't even be enabled via the settings GUI. The only potential drama is that GNOME added explicit sync support in 46.1, which seems to be totally stable though.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by hf_139 View Post
            If you want to be a stable distribution, you can not use GNOME.
            I like how you are reality have never met. it does however lead to poor quality trolling.

            How many enterprise stability distributions offer a default desktop other than gnome?

            RHEL? Gnome
            Ubuntu LTS? Gnome
            Debian? Gnome
            SUSE? Gnome.

            Even historically non-gnome places like SUSE have Gnome as their desktop for their enterprise offering.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by hf_139 View Post
              If you want to be a stable distribution, you can not use GNOME.
              Sorry but your comment is deprecated. Others: just don't care.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by You- View Post

                I like how you are reality have never met. it does however lead to poor quality trolling.

                How many enterprise stability distributions offer a default desktop other than gnome?

                RHEL? Gnome
                Ubuntu LTS? Gnome
                Debian? Gnome
                SUSE? Gnome.

                Even historically non-gnome places like SUSE have Gnome as their desktop for their enterprise offering.
                Ironic too considering each release breaks the majority of extensions people come to depend on, causing either the distro and/or extension maintainer to have to rebase every release. Stability in software often considers backwards compatibility, which Gnome is terrible at historically. Suse still prioritizes Plasma too, and I don't see YaST moving to the insanity of gtk4 anytime soon.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Shadywack View Post

                  Ironic too considering each release breaks the majority of extensions people come to depend on, causing either the distro and/or extension maintainer to have to rebase every release. Stability in software often considers backwards compatibility, which Gnome is terrible at historically. Suse still prioritizes Plasma too, and I don't see YaST moving to the insanity of gtk4 anytime soon.
                  It's true that extensions break, but they are not considered an official feature after all. And if you use a distro like Fedora or Ubuntu your extensions have been patched by the time you move to a new GNOME version 99% of the time anyway. And what do you consider the insanity of GTK4? Vastly imrpoved performance maybe?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Shadywack View Post

                    Ironic too considering each release breaks the majority of extensions people come to depend on, causing either the distro and/or extension maintainer to have to rebase every release. Stability in software often considers backwards compatibility, which Gnome is terrible at historically. Suse still prioritizes Plasma too, and I don't see YaST moving to the insanity of gtk4 anytime soon.
                    More ironic that you dont realise the enterprise stable distro releases generally stick to a single version of gnome, or even if they were to upgrade, the only extensions that will matter will be the ones they ship in their own repositories.

                    I think RHEL 7 and 8 used to update the desktop to a newer version, but even they have stopped. Ubuntu LTS and Debian never have. (I dont know what SUSE does).

                    The only version of gnome that matters to an enterprise distro is the one it ships. The only extensions that matter to it are also the ones they themselves ship, which will be in lockstep with their version of gnome.​

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X