Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Firefox 127 With 32-bit x86 Linux Pretending To Be "x86_64" To Reduce Fingerprinting

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • oiaohm
    replied
    Originally posted by qarium View Post
    looks like i see the future before it happens only like 1 hour later after this post this happened:
    Has trump broken the legal system of the USA the answer is yes.



    Yes 13 days after Trump put himself above the rule of law someone has attempted to kill him.

    Dictatorship not publishing laws has to be always been looking out for the next person planing to kill them. There is advantage to not putting oneself above the law even as a dictator. The advantage is normally being able to pay garbage amount of money to compensate a person for the crimes you have committed as a dictator. This garbage amount of money lowers the discontent and reduces the numbers of people who want to kill person who is the dictator.
    Even as a dictator because issues from putting you above the law apply even if you are not a dictator yet.

    The reality with the immunity case of Trump he placed him self in the same location as Julius Caesar,

    Yes absolute immunity claim for president has effectively made Trump dead man walking.

    Leave a comment:


  • qarium
    replied
    Originally posted by qarium View Post

    you really have a misunderstanding as you showed with the Julius Caesar example-.

    you can be the best person in the world the most wise and most intelligent and most clever and a absolut hero if the weak and the poor and the small and the hard working and the people in need you could be JESUS himself
    there will always be evil people and a villain who because he is evil plot and try to kill you.

    and all measures as you describe​ to minimize the risk of being murdered what you claim is a advantage is in reality no advantage at all all what you describe only helps the wicket people the rotten to the core people the evil people the villains to corrupt your state and system and to perform their evil-doing.

    yes you have the risk of being murdered but this is not because you do something wrong or because you do something evil its really only because you are a good person and any good person has a vilain as a enemy and of course the villain who want perform evil without any blockage in his way will always see a good king and good dictator as enemy who need to be assassinated.

    just see the proofed ~35+ attempted murder​ against donald trump if donald trump would be a 1000 time better human this would only result in 3500 attempted murder because the better human you are the more villains will try to murder you.

    same with putin he has proofed ~250+ attempted murder against him and if putin would be a 1000 time better human this number just would jump to 250000 attempted murder against him because more and more sickos villains will swear to murder him​.

    its plain and simple not true that if you are a better human that then villains will spare your life this is just yet another lie its the complete opposite the more good you are as a human are the more villains will try to murder you.
    looks like i see the future before it happens only like 1 hour later after this post this happened:

    " TRUMP WAS JUST SHOT ON LIVE TV"
    Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.


    " Attacker at Donald Trump’s rally killed by US Secret Service sniper | BBC News"


    " Shooter opens fire at Trump during rally; former president injured but 'fine,' gunman and spectator killed"

    Leave a comment:


  • oiaohm
    replied
    Originally posted by qarium View Post
    you picket up the worst example of history Julius Caesar....

    at that time they had a system of Plutocratic Oligarchy who the super rich had a seat in the senate.
    and the general population and poor workers and poor soldiers had nothing to say at all.
    Jury of Peers does not say fair

    Originally posted by qarium View Post
    Julius Caesar as in fact the champion of the little people of the worker class and of the small soldiers and these nasty rotten to the core people murdered him because he did took side for the small people.
    This is a dangerous mistake. There is a repeating thing where a person claims to be for the little people but this is only to get power in the first place.

    Originally posted by qarium View Post
    you can be the best person in the world the most wise and most intelligent and most clever and a absolut hero if the weak and the poor and the small and the hard working and the people in need you could be JESUS himself
    there will always be evil people and a villain who because he is evil plot and try to kill you..
    Jesus is not a good example. Jesus was not nonviolent that demos in the Cleansing of the Temple. Yes this action of Jesus is counter to his own teachings "Turning the other cheek".

    Violence does have the habit of causing more Violence.

    The description you gave is Mahatma Gandhi. Yes it documented that people did think about killing him but there was one very big problem he had truly done absolutely nothing wrong so all the plots faded away in the thinking stage. Its really simple to miss Jesus does violence in the temple against people who did not know better and it those people who in the end of the day end up deciding is fate of execution..


    Originally posted by qarium View Post
    your theory virus hit again... and you also explain why this "kill your complete population" claim is and was never true.
    in these cultured with non-writen traditional laws they performed public executions and all other members of society where told why this person has to die. what he did to harm the society.

    Originally posted by qarium View Post
    keep in mind in modern Democratic Republic 's the prisons are full and the prisoners have to perform slave labor (this was never the case in nordic germanic tribes) and death penalthy is more common in the democratic republic usa than was ever in the nordic germanic tribes 1000 of years ago.
    We know from the viking records that Slave trade existed in the nordic germanic and was one of their criminal punishments. Because they bought slaves from.



    There is no direct link between incarceration rate and government type. Also the death penalty
    This report covers the judicial use of the death penalty for the period January to December 2022. Amnesty International reports only on executions, death sentences and other aspects of the use of the death penalty, such as commutations and exonerations, where there is reasonable confirmation. In many countries governments do not publish information on their […]


    Out of all the democratic republics you can pick USA is the worse in this area right??? No it not the worse is Egypt remember Remember Egypt population is 1/3 that of the USA. China is only roughly 5 to 4 times larger population than USA.. USA 18 executions by 5 gives 90 China is confirmed to have real executions exceeding a 1000s per year. Yes China is order of magnitudes worse than USA in this regard.

    Iran that is completetly on another scale 1/3 to 1/4 the population of the USA but 576 executions yes lets be conservative and times 576*3 yes for USA to match Iran they would have to be doing at least 576*3 in executions this is 1728​ yes this is most likely two order of magnitude out.

    Yes the top 3 for executions being "China, Iran and Saudi Arabia" that are not democratic republics is off the scale compared to every other place on earth today. Sad part Iran rate is close to historic nordic germanic.

    The death penalty in the USA is high but on historic normal not that high per number of population. Per 100000 people rate of population for death penalty USA is not that much of a outlier in fact the death penalty rate from historic records for Nordic Germanic people compared to their population numbers have more executions than the USA..

    USA 0.027​ executions per 100000 people. Executions in the USA are not in fact that common media coverage makes them seam way more common that what they really are. Without media coverage of the executions in the USA majority of the population would know nothing about them and have zero executed relatives.

    Yes only 10% of countries around the world use death penalty at all. Majority of those countries are not Democratic Republics. Like it or not the Nordic Germanic people executed people at a far higher rate than the USA does today. USA executions are not highly common. No where near as common as the media coverage makes out.

    Reality modern day USA vs historic nordic germanic you are way more likely to be put to death in nordic germanic than modern USA. Remember USA is one of the worst Democratic Republics when it comes on execution rates and this is still better than may other countries.

    USA imprisonment rate is not great either but there are other Democratic Republics that have very low imprisonment rates..

    qarium you have a rose colour glasses problem with nordic germanic you are missing how bad it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • qarium
    replied
    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post
    Nordic germanic is not uniform. Something you have to remember published does not always mean text or on paper. I know from Australian aboriginal that laws were recorded in particular caves as cave art some of these law arts are over 10000BC old. There is question if it was pure verbally traditions or that today we just don't have the skill any more to read the old nordic germanic artworks to see the recorded/published law. Particular cultures around the world older than the Nordic germanic have art recorded laws.
    There is more than 1 way to publish a law. Yes if no law is published/transmitted to tell people from not doing something and your kill everyone doing that crime there is a chance you kill your complete population. Yes a form of publishing a law is like public executions and so on is important to keep the number of criminals livable amount.
    your theory virus hit again... and you also explain why this "kill your complete population" claim is and was never true.
    in these cultured with non-writen traditional laws they performed public executions and all other members of society where told why this person has to die. what he did to harm the society.

    the nordic germanic tribes more or less had no prisons someone who did something wrong had to pay compensation and if he did not pay in hard work or money like gold/silver then he was executed.

    a execution was a very very very rare event because nearly all did prever the compensation payment.

    by the way in modern states if someone has to pay money as punishment the money most of the time goes to the state... in the nordic germanic tribes this was not the case the money did always go to the victim. and not to the state.

    "Nordic germanic is not uniform."

    yes right but again... theory virus ...

    keep in mind in modern Democratic Republic 's the prisons are full and the prisoners have to perform slave labor (this was never the case in nordic germanic tribes) and death penalthy is more common in the democratic republic usa than was ever in the nordic germanic tribes 1000 of years ago.

    you Glorify the modern state and system but it is clearly flawed why we need prisons and these old cultured did not need prison ? its a complete joke.

    yes in some castles they had prisoners rooms but if you do some math and you calculate the prison rooms of these castles and compare it to the modern law system its a complete joke the USA has like 1 million times more prisoners than the nordic Germanic tribes had 1000 of years ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • qarium
    replied
    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post
    ​This is you being wrong. A democratic republic can also attempt not to publish laws. The state secrets stuff. But this has the problem that this will normally be view though the lens of the published laws.
    Dictatorship not publishing laws has to be always been looking out for the next person planing to kill them. There is advantage to not putting oneself above the law even as a dictator. The advantage is normally being able to pay garbage amount of money to compensate a person for the crimes you have committed as a dictator. This garbage amount of money lowers the discontent and reduces the numbers of people who want to kill person who is the dictator.
    Yes wise Dictator writes laws and uses his power to over ride laws to make all his punishments for breaking the laws pay compensation so to appear understanding to the people.
    Absolute immunity to law when you look at history is generally a mistake and is a path to assassination. Part immunity to laws is effective. Part immunity as in cannot be jailed or killed for crimes only has to pay damages by history is the safe route.
    you really have a misunderstanding as you showed with the Julius Caesar example-.

    you can be the best person in the world the most wise and most intelligent and most clever and a absolut hero if the weak and the poor and the small and the hard working and the people in need you could be JESUS himself
    there will always be evil people and a villain who because he is evil plot and try to kill you.

    and all measures as you describe​ to minimize the risk of being murdered what you claim is a advantage is in reality no advantage at all all what you describe only helps the wicket people the rotten to the core people the evil people the villains to corrupt your state and system and to perform their evil-doing.

    yes you have the risk of being murdered but this is not because you do something wrong or because you do something evil its really only because you are a good person and any good person has a vilain as a enemy and of course the villain who want perform evil without any blockage in his way will always see a good king and good dictator as enemy who need to be assassinated.

    just see the proofed ~35+ attempted murder​ against donald trump if donald trump would be a 1000 time better human this would only result in 3500 attempted murder because the better human you are the more villains will try to murder you.

    same with putin he has proofed ~250+ attempted murder against him and if putin would be a 1000 time better human this number just would jump to 250000 attempted murder against him because more and more sickos villains will swear to murder him​.

    its plain and simple not true that if you are a better human that then villains will spare your life this is just yet another lie its the complete opposite the more good you are as a human are the more villains will try to murder you.

    Leave a comment:


  • qarium
    replied
    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post
    Someone was a sleep in history class. Julius Caesar you should have learnt about the roman dictator and his death. Julius Ceaser classic military coup model of "Trial in Absentia" of dictator by peers then the dictator being executed by peers.
    The highest judge in all systems is always the jury of peers​. Remember if someone has peer power to the dictator they can prosecute them the method can be quite nasty. Yes head of military pulled a coup over existing dictator does happen so does Military coups over a Military coup.
    There is something important here as a dictator if put your self above the law you should expect you will be have a "Trial in Absentia" done against you by people with peer power to you. Then the people who took part in that "Trial in Absentia" come and execute you. Of course those doing the "Trial in Absentia" will only be using what are classed as published laws and possible their own new minted laws..
    Remember "Trial in Absentia" no right to plead your case that what you were doing was right. This is the downside of being a Dictator who does not obey the rule of law.
    you picket up the worst example of history Julius Caesar....

    at that time they had a system of Plutocratic Oligarchy who the super rich had a seat in the senate.
    and the general population and poor workers and poor soldiers had nothing to say at all.
    as Julius Caesar did come back from the north from the celtic(france) and Germanic expansion wars
    he discovered that this super rich money elite Plutocratic Oligarchy ruined the country the general population and the poor workers and the poor soldiers they suffered in poverty this did make Julius Caesar so
    angry that he overruled the senate and opposed his dictatorship rules and regulations and laws on the
    Plutocratic Oligarchy Senate to save the nation and to save the poor from poverty to stabilize the worker class and to uplift the salary of the soldiers all at the at the expense​ of the super rich plutocratic oligarchy elites of the senate. this fact did drive these Rotten to the Core plutocratic oligarchy elites so angry that in the end they murdered Julius Caesar.

    Julius Caesar as in fact the champion of the little people of the worker class and of the small soldiers and these nasty rotten to the core people murdered him because he did took side for the small people.

    Leave a comment:


  • oiaohm
    replied
    Originally posted by qarium View Post
    this is nonsense because they do not even have to change the laws because they are also the highest judge in their country and no other judge can overrule his ruling. this means even if he does not change the law no one can court him because he is the highest judge and he decide otherwise.
    Someone was a sleep in history class. Julius Caesar you should have learnt about the roman dictator and his death. Julius Ceaser classic military coup model of "Trial in Absentia" of dictator by peers then the dictator being executed by peers.

    The highest judge in all systems is always the jury of peers​. Remember if someone has peer power to the dictator they can prosecute them the method can be quite nasty. Yes head of military pulled a coup over existing dictator does happen so does Military coups over a Military coup.

    There is something important here as a dictator if put your self above the law you should expect you will be have a "Trial in Absentia" done against you by people with peer power to you. Then the people who took part in that "Trial in Absentia" come and execute you. Of course those doing the "Trial in Absentia" will only be using what are classed as published laws and possible their own new minted laws..

    Remember "Trial in Absentia" no right to plead your case that what you were doing was right. This is the downside of being a Dictator who does not obey the rule of law.

    Originally posted by qarium View Post
    in a democratic republic you have to publish them right in a dictatorship this is not the case.
    ​This is you being wrong. A democratic republic can also attempt not to publish laws. The state secrets stuff. But this has the problem that this will normally be view though the lens of the published laws.

    Dictatorship not publishing laws has to be always been looking out for the next person planing to kill them. There is advantage to not putting oneself above the law even as a dictator. The advantage is normally being able to pay garbage amount of money to compensate a person for the crimes you have committed as a dictator. This garbage amount of money lowers the discontent and reduces the numbers of people who want to kill person who is the dictator.

    Yes wise Dictator writes laws and uses his power to over ride laws to make all his punishments for breaking the laws pay compensation so to appear understanding to the people.

    Absolute immunity to law when you look at history is generally a mistake and is a path to assassination. Part immunity to laws is effective. Part immunity as in cannot be jailed or killed for crimes only has to pay damages by history is the safe route.

    Originally posted by qarium View Post
    keep in mind in the last 10000 years for example in the nordic germanic tribes published on paper laws are not that old and in the most time of the last 10000 years means more than 9000 years there was never a published law. there was only verbally traditions passed from the old generation to the new generation remembered
    and applied by the local leader. and in the case of the case a ruling NOT based on these remembered verbal transmitted traditions was also accepted means the law was never published then someone did violate the law and was punished it was the good will or bas will what was ruled on and you was punished for your crime even if no law was ever published prohibit your doing.
    Nordic germanic is not uniform. Something you have to remember published does not always mean text or on paper. I know from Australian aboriginal that laws were recorded in particular caves as cave art some of these law arts are over 10000BC old. There is question if it was pure verbally traditions or that today we just don't have the skill any more to read the old nordic germanic artworks to see the recorded/published law. Particular cultures around the world older than the Nordic germanic have art recorded laws.

    There is more than 1 way to publish a law. Yes if no law is published/transmitted to tell people from not doing something and your kill everyone doing that crime there is a chance you kill your complete population. Yes a form of publishing a law is like public executions and so on is important to keep the number of criminals livable amount.

    Leave a comment:


  • qarium
    replied
    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post
    Dictator who break their own laws and get prosecuted for them are human they failed to change the law before they broken them.
    this is nonsense because they do not even have to change the laws because they are also the highest judge in their country and no other judge can overrule his ruling. this means even if he does not change the law no one can court him because he is the highest judge and he decide otherwise.

    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post
    You cannot have people follow laws if you don't publish them.
    in a democratic republic you have to publish them right in a dictatorship this is not the case.
    keep in mind in the last 10000 years for example in the nordic germanic tribes published on paper laws are not that old and in the most time of the last 10000 years means more than 9000 years there was never a published law. there was only verbally traditions passed from the old generation to the new generation remembered
    and applied by the local leader. and in the case of the case a ruling NOT based on these remembered verbal transmitted traditions was also accepted means the law was never published then someone did violate the law and was punished it was the good will or bas will what was ruled on and you was punished for your crime even if no law was ever published prohibit your doing.
    this clearly shows that your complete mindset is formed in a democratic republic and you expect on paper published laws like in a democratic republic. but well a democratic republic in the last 10000 years was never a long time phenomenon.
    and published on paper laws are even bad because you can exploid it much more easily than you can exploid a non-writen traditional local leader is the judge without writen law because any kind of bad and ill behavior will be punished and you will not find a loop-hole in the writen law to escape punishment.
    because of all the loop-holes to escape punishment my opinion is that modern writen and published laws of the democratic republics are dysfunctional and bad. a traditional verbal law system like in the nordic germanic pagan tribes 1000 of years ago is much better because the tolerance for loop-holes to exploit the law was zero.

    Leave a comment:


  • oiaohm
    replied
    Originally posted by qarium View Post
    you claim something different than i did say... you say i did claim 80% of the voters did vote for trump
    this exactly this i did NEVER say i said 80% of the legitimate voters did vote for trump.
    there is a long long list of humans who are not legitimate voters who did vote anyway.
    Phoronix: Firefox 127 With 32-bit x86 Linux Pretending To Be "x86_64" To Reduce Fingerprinting Mozilla Firefox 127.0 binaries are available for download today ahead of tomorrow's official announcement. Firefox 127 brings a few nice changes for this month's feature update... https://www.phoronix.com/news/Mozilla


    Donald Trump won the 2020 US election with 80% of all valid votes.
    That you claim.
    Take my posts.
    2020 usa election only had a 66.9% turn out and Biden the winner got 51.3%​ lets run the maths. 51.3*0.669 that right biden only had by this vote ~34.3% of the population who can vote supporting him. Trump 46.9*0.669 only about 32% of the population who can vote. Yes roughly 1/3 of the USA population did not vote for either of them and if that if there is no fake votes.

    Lets say what you wrote is true to the level Trump claimed . Remember Trump claimed he won 80% of the real vote. By the counted vote 32% of the possible population voted for Trump 32/0.8 gives you 40% of the population voted. The reality here to come USA president there is a min vote number of the election has to be called a wash and redone and 40% is under this number.
    By the way the min percentage is fun to find with the USA messed up with all the different state rules over elections.

    qarium 80% of what you call valid votes does not mean Trump won. The reality is even if you take that number Trump still loses. Trump did not in 2020 have the required votes to come president due to the way the USA system works.

    Rudy Giuliani
    The Technology Used in the 2000 Mules Documentary. Guests: Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips: With Rudy Giuliani, Catherine Engelbrecht, Gregg Phillips.

    Look at the cast of 2000 Mules. Yes you are quoting Rudoph Glulian.

    looks like you do not know the mechanics of lies... a lie is always created in a way that you believe it
    if i would be a liar then i would had claimed your 55-60% just to be sure you believe the lie.
    it it the truth and you can easily detect this by the logic of lie the 80% is so high that you would NEVER believe it.
    this means by the logic of lies this 80% number must be the truth because it does not fit in the liars schema.​
    A win 55-60% would have left enough votes to allow the USA electoral collage system to appoint Trump without causing stacks of seats to abstain to the point of failure to appoint resulting in having to redo election.
    Rudoph Giuliani is not a smart fibber. 80% is too much to claim Trump got that votes by because that number no way Trump can win. That number is a redo election due to the way the election collage would fail in the USA. Mind you I would have loved to see the USA election collage system in 2020 go splat fail and force a re run of the election and that would have been the first time in history.

    i am clearly not a russian you can visit me in germany.
    German due to USSR rule percentage of Russian logic is taught but not enough to be skilled. You are not clearly not Russian online and this has history cause. USSR ruling over west germany has left you Germans with a percentage of broken Russian deception tricks of course you are not as skilled as a Russian to know how to use them correctly.

    You could visit me there is problem my family is about half German and half Russian. I understand what you have picked up from the Russians. If you don't learn what you have picked up from Russian culture you will keep on being called a Russian troll. As I said you are not skilled enough to be a Russian troll you are getting things wrong they would not get wrong. But you are also using Russian deception methods of argument.

    The Russians Trolls are more skilled liars than you.

    liars do not use statistical abnormality numbers liars just tell you what you want to hear means you want to hear 55-60% then they give you exactly what you want the 55% - 60%...
    This is not true either. Liars like Russians claiming how many HIMARS​ they have destroyed exceed all possible numbers as well. Election fraud russians This is a particular area where Russians are more skilled it due to their education. qarium you are not Russian because you don't have the Russian Education to see and perform election fraud in some what believable way.

    A liar can only say a believable lie
    1) if they can work out what the believable value is. (items you find in the Russian schools math classes required here for elections including fun of turning law text into maths)
    2) they are lucky.

    Reality the Rudoph Giuliani is none of the above. You are also none of the above because you keep on pushing a unbelievable number. The reality is if Trump did get 80% of the vote the election was a wash in 2020 and would have had to be redone because the system to appoint president would have broken.

    my opinion is that age does not matter at all even a 10 year old children would do it if the 10 year old children is sane and sound and mature.
    No age does matter when job is something like the USA president. Jet lag and other forms of disrupted sleep issues.
    A 15-day simulated jet lag experiment was performed in a time isolation laboratory using 15 old women (79-91 years, mean 82.9 years) and 10 old men (71-86 years, mean 80.5 years). After five full days and nights on the subject's habitual routine, the waketime of night 6 was advanced by 6 h, truncati …

    The following is what got Biden in recent debate.
    However, sleep disruption (and daytime sleepiness) appeared to be longer lived in the elderly, showing little of the recovery over time observed in younger subjects.

    As you get older you means to burn the candle at both ends gets less and less. This is why 70 is limit for head of military here. The human body has limits one of them is less means to deal with sleep disruption as you get past 65..

    Also a 10 year old child is not suitable for another reason.

    Yes 9-12 hours in sleep required. Yes adult can get away with 7 and stay health. 2 to 5 hours of work loss to per day with a 10 year old doing the job.

    qarium basically there are medical reasons why neither Trump or Biden should be the president of the USA. Both are too old to have to deal with sleeping at random times as what is required when wars and the like break out. Yes both are not going to be able to maintain focus due to their age combined with sleep disruption the job of USA president will require. Yes the 10 year old is too young you because they will not be able to stay awake for enough hours. Between 19-70 is the range ages person need to be in with bias to the lower end of that range to have good recovery after sleep disruption.

    Please note I am not saying the elderly don't have their place. Elderly doing training of the next generation and the like where they don't have to mess up their sleeping patterns is a good use to them.

    The idea that Age does not matter is a flawed thing. Age matters in some jobs. Sane and sound and mature and medicinally able to do the job. Yes medically able to do the job age does come a factor. USA president and roles like it has job requirements that are not elderly friendly.

    Please note there are two ages. "Chronological age​" that measured from the time your are born. Biological age​ that based on how your body is functioning. Yes that 19-70 is "Chronological age​" in a person who has done nothing to cause their Biological age to progress abnormally. So it might be possible for someone who is 16 years old to have a body of a 19 year old because their biological age as progressed quickly. The 70 is 5 years over what is advisable so 70 and be find body has to be aging slower than the average by a decent margin.

    Leave a comment:


  • qarium
    replied
    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post


    you mean this "2000 Mules is a 2022 American conspiracist[4][5][6][7] political film from right-wing political commentator Dinesh D'Souza.​" and "Dinesh Joseph D'Souza (/dɪˈnɛʃ dəˈsuːzə/; born April 25, 1961) is an Indian-American right-wing[1][2][3] political commentator, conspiracy theorist, author, filmmaker and convicted felon who received a Presidential pardon by Donald Trump for his crimes.​"

    to me wikipedia is not a trusted source the wikipedia is part of the liberal world order/rules based order of the left-liberal-green establishment ... in political topics whatever wikipedia writes i do not believe it. because i know and i can proof that that wikipedia is complete fraud and hoax.

    if you follow this youtube channel:
    "Geschichten aus Wikihausen" Kontakt: Email: [email protected] [email protected] Impressum: http://wikihausen.de/impressum/ ---- Liebe Zuschauer, bitte unterstützen Sie unsere Arbeit mit einer einmaligen Zuwendung oder einem Dauerauftrag. Für eine Standard-Überweisungen nutzen Sie bitte folgende Kontoverbindung: Inhaber: Markus Fiedler IBAN: DE45 2805 0100 0092 8701 46 Verwendungszweck: Wikihausen Bank: Landessparkasse zu Oldenburg BIC: SLZODE22XXX Für Zahlungen via Paypal nutzen Sie bitte folgenden Link: http://paypal.me/wikihausen

    from this person:


    then you can discover that wikipedia is complete fake and hoax and is manipulated and cheated in every aspect.

    i did watch many such documentaries about wikipedia it is mostly rigged by left-liberal-green establishment and israel.

    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post

    Problem author of the 2000 mules is known for false data and this is before 2020. There is no evidence of any voter fraud in the 2020 election.
    The reality whats in 2000 mules fails closer inspection.
    Yes written in the wikipedia
    problem is that wikipedia is known for false data and wikihausen/Dirk_Pohlmann proof it 1000 of times.

    written in the wikipedia means nothing i have over 1000 edits on wikipedia to and as a wikipedia author i know it is all fake and hoax. you can not believe wikipedia in political topics.
    you can only believe wikipedia in technical topics or about mathematics or computer science
    but politics not its clearly scam for politics.

    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post
    qarium yes that 2000 Mules footage turns out not to show what it claimed. Peer review is important. Yes prior Dinesh D'Souza so called prior documentataries have the same problems. His stuff never passes peer review and normally end up with him losing in court to different parties who put in the effort to sue.


    i have different opinion about peer reviewers they need money and because of this a person with enough money can simple buy these people to fake a peer review report.

    wikipedia is fake and fraud to and wikipedia and you can proof this and i showed you youtube channel who only does this and also wikipedia also does not perform peer review reports.

    why do you use wikipedia if wikipedia does not perform peer review reports ?

    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post

    Countries with Compulsory voting that enforced this does not happen.

    Yes only 10 countries in the world.
    195 countries only 10 can do voting as Thales says you should. So roughly 5% of countries get it right and 95% get it wrong so of course you see this problem everywhere..


    exactly this problem is everywhere and as you say only 10 countries do it right.. as you say 95% do it wrong.
    but then tell me why do you want a system who 95% of all people do it wrong?
    compulsory voting is highly inpractical and in a country with compulsory voting the citizens literally do not have freedom at all.

    why not a lottery parliament. with such a lottery parliament you get the same result with much less pain.

    also keep in mind like in france every election ends in riots and violence if you do not have elections at all in a lottery parliament all this bad stuff will never happen...

    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post

    This would be ideal Thales but this also does not happen.


    so you admit that the lottery parliament would be the ideal "Thales" based system...

    well then tell me why do we not try this instead of democracy elections ?

    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post

    With compulsory voting you get what that number is of people who don't want to vote even if your force them. About 1 in 10 people don't want to vote or cannot vote when you have compulsory voting.
    Yes you have less than 90% turn out in a election you have a problem. Also is worse than you think.
    all these problems do not exist in a lottery parliament ... every citizen gets a lottery ticket and randomness decide who gets place in the parliament.

    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post
    ​​
    Take the 2017 german election since you raise german all the time
    Winner got 42% of the vote right. The turn out was only 76.2% so what percentage of the population in fact supported the winner. 42*0.762=32% of the population.
    exactly you are right and this 32% minority believe they are the majority and they can rule over the majority.
    but a lottery parliament would not have this problem at all.
    in a lottery system you do not have a turn out of voting quota in the election.

    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post
    ​​​
    2020 usa election only had a 66.9% turn out and Biden the winner got 51.3%​ lets run the maths. 51.3*0.669 that right biden only had by this vote ~34.3% of the population who can vote supporting him. Trump 46.9*0.669 only about 32% of the population who can vote. Yes roughly 1/3 of the USA population did not vote for either of them and if that if there is no fake votes.


    the official numbers are clearly wrong and also a lottery parliament does not have this problem
    a lottery parliament really represent the complete society and the complete population.

    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post
    ​​​
    Really even with all the claimed fraud votes removed neither party has over 50% of the population behind them.
    Really ideal system you want that the party for a key role like a president has to cross the line of 50% of the population who can vote not that do vote.
    Yes the 2020 USA election really was not that far off to being the the point that the people who did not vote outnumbered the Winner. Yes if the fake votes claim in the USA 2020 are true this simple means that the people who did not vote have a larger percentage than either Biden or Trump got so by Thales neither should have been given power because neither candidate was suitable.


    "either Biden or Trump got so by Thales neither should have been given power because neither candidate was suitable."

    well you are a little slower than me because i already told you that any election should be banned.
    with a lottery parliament you would not have stupid election fight between 2 kingpins like donald trump and joe biden.
    a election for the presidency of the usa is just a show run for narcissists​ and the bigger narcissists​ wins.

    and these Narcissists gaslight the rest of the population into believe that they are the king of the country.

    Originally posted by oiaohm View Post
    ​​​​
    This is another problem why is the winner calculated in elections based on the numbers of people who voted not the number of people who could have voted. This is another form of rigging. Math classes teach about elections they also teach all the maths you need to see the rigging right? Notice most school math text books don't cover layered percentage operations like I just did because teaching that makes it too simple to see how voter turn out results in a not popular person in fact being given power.
    you are absolutely right here in germany math teachers are forced to teach democracy but they do not teach to correctly calculate the rigging of the election.
    this is really horrible.
    you are absolutly right the mathematic classes of today do not teach the necessary math skills to understand a democratic election.

    and if they do not unterstand the mathematics of a election they of course put a unpopular person into power.​

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X