AMD Radeon Linux Gaming Performance At Parity Between KDE Plasma 6.0 X11 vs. Wayland

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • qarium
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 3396

    Originally posted by mSparks View Post
    That was the pitch for why time and money should be invested in wayland to replace X11, hindsight is a wonderful thing, see also
    For those picking up on this as "news", please read the following list: PCSX2 still supports Wayland. It just prefers the XCB/XWayland platform by default. You can set the I_WANT_A_BROKE...

    "xwayland is only legacy code"
    alternatively
    the reason X11 has the large and diverse userbase it has is because it has incorporated a large quantity of feedback from a large number of people with a diverse set of requirements over a very long period of time. Ditch any one of those requirements and you also ditch the users that want/need it.
    no one is ditching any of these requirements it just need time and afford to reimplement it in a modern and save way.

    "large quantity of feedback from a large number of people with a diverse set of requirements over a very long period of time"

    yes of course wayland in this meaning has a long way to go to also collect large quantity of freedback from large number of people with diverse set of requirements over long time...

    X11 had 30 years but people claim wayland only has 15 years until people throw it in the trash
    Phantom circuit Sequence Reducer Dyslexia

    Comment

    • qarium
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2008
      • 3396

      Originally posted by piotrj3 View Post
      Yes, but there are 4 advantages Wayland possibly could have:
      1st. Xwayland doesn't support all things X does, so technically it might have certain performance advantages from simply having less features.
      2nd. X technically always puts all graphics calls into single queue. Modern GPUs do support execution of many queues. This could improve utilization. Even if Xwayland puts stuff in one queue all stuff outside of X (like DE, etc.) could be another so potentially DE is less blocking stuff from Xwayland.
      3rd. Modern GPUs have hardware accelerated scheduler. In windows known as HAGS. Now HAGS don't always improve performance, sometimes it makes it worse, but sometimes it improves quite a lot, potential area to investigate and improve performance again with.
      4th. Maybe utilization of SAM (smart access memory) or known as resizable BAR ( i know it is more driver level, but modern things should be made more aware of it).
      I know Xwayland's part of X won't have big performance increases - that is extremly unlikely. But Wayland's compositor probably should be more efficient at utilizing GPU comparing to X server composing. That is where that 1-2% i could expect.
      and when exactly do you accept reality that in reality and practice it has the opposite effect ?

      any sane person should not worry about the performance of a clear legacy only codepath.
      Phantom circuit Sequence Reducer Dyslexia

      Comment

      • qarium
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 3396

        Originally posted by WileEPyote View Post
        Nothing is preventing someone else from taking over on x11 development. Nobody seems to want to.
        he is software developer himself he can do it himself... but he will not thats the joke.

        he say it loud and clear he is the kind of person who to not have any trouble for himself better wait 10 years and only then if bug-free he will use it.
        Phantom circuit Sequence Reducer Dyslexia

        Comment

        • mSparks
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2007
          • 2040

          Originally posted by qarium View Post

          X11 had 30 years but people claim wayland only has 15 years until people throw it in the trash
          X11 has had 30 years of massive success, forming the backbone of the tech stack and developer gui for google, amazon, facebook, LinkedIn, twitter and now every single super computer in the top500 list of supercomputers- including the latest by the microsofties.

          wayland has had 15 years of promising its already better than X11 while ripping out all the features that makes X11 useful to try and be more like windows and to beat X11 for gaming.
          Last edited by mSparks; 10 April 2024, 11:26 PM.

          Comment

          • mrg666
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2023
            • 1012

            Originally posted by mSparks View Post

            X11 has had 30 years of massive success, forming the backbone of the tech stack and developer gui for google, amazon, facebook, LinkedIn, twitter and now every single super computer in the top500 list of supercomputers- including the latest by the microsofties.

            wayland has had 15 years of promising its already better than X11 while ripping out all the features that makes X11 useful to try and be more like windows and to beat X11 for gaming.
            You are determined to play this broken record to perfection.

            Yet those top500 computers all disable x11 for security. No admin would run X11 server on a server computer. That xterm or another x11 app you run remotely does not mean X11 server is running on the server. You are running the X11 server on your client side. You are confusing servers with a workstation/desktop where X11 miserably fails to provide modern graphics capabilities.

            I guess you like x11 so much since you don't know it that much.

            Keep talking ... X11 yadayadayadadyada

            Comment

            • qarium
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2008
              • 3396

              Originally posted by mSparks View Post
              X11 has had 30 years of massive success, forming the backbone of the tech stack and developer gui for google, amazon, facebook, LinkedIn, twitter and now every single super computer in the top500 list of supercomputers- including the latest by the microsofties.

              this is clearly wrong because the marketshare of X11 systems against microsoft and apple in the desktop and notebook market in all these 30 years was always less than 1%....
              you have a strange definition of success x11 losing hard against microsoft systems in the market.
              and x11 was also broken by design just to make sure x11 can never compete against microsoft in the desktop market.

              its the same of OpenGL vs DirectX you would claim OpenGL was a massive success and in reality OpenGL did always lose hard against DirectX.

              Originally posted by mSparks View Post
              wayland has had 15 years of promising its already better than X11 while ripping out all the features that makes X11 useful to try and be more like windows and to beat X11 for gaming.
              and here you have a deep misunderstanding to 30 years ago X11 had no competitor in the Unix market means they never had to compete against anyone but X11 itself.
              wayland compared to this has a hard time to adobt in the market only because the people have the ability and possibility to just stay with x11...

              it is always hard to establish a new standard against a old standard. x11 30 years ago did not have this problem.
              Phantom circuit Sequence Reducer Dyslexia

              Comment

              • qarium
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2008
                • 3396

                Originally posted by mrg666 View Post
                You are determined to play this broken record to perfection.
                Yet those top500 computers all disable x11 for security. No admin would run X11 server on a server computer. That xterm or another x11 app you run remotely does not mean X11 server is running on the server. You are running the X11 server on your client side. You are confusing servers with a workstation/desktop where X11 miserably fails to provide modern graphics capabilities.
                I guess you like x11 so much since you don't know it that much.
                Keep talking ... X11 yadayadayadadyada
                you are right its like OpenGL failed against DirectX in the market and also X11 systems Failed against Windows systems in the Desktop market.

                all his example how x11 was a success has nothing to do with "workstation/desktop"

                "X11 miserably fails to provide modern graphics capabilities"

                its pretty clear that he does not use any modern graphics capabilities.

                he clearly is not valve who need all these modern graphics capabilities to sell valve steam deck consoles.
                Phantom circuit Sequence Reducer Dyslexia

                Comment

                • mSparks
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 2040

                  Originally posted by qarium View Post

                  this is clearly wrong because the marketshare of X11 systems against microsoft and apple in the desktop and notebook market in all these 30 years was always less than 1%....
                  server and server development is a completely different software stack with very different requirements than the consumer/client side software stack. And Linux owns effectively 100% of both.

                  linux/x11 for the serverside
                  android Linux/surface flinger for the clientside.

                  apple does have a meaningful share of the client side - some 10 or 20% of devices now, microsoft has drifted into oblivion, some 300 million barely used devices out of 10s of billions of devices used daily.

                  There is a microsoftie tendancy to exclude the 99.99% of devices people use on a daily basis when claiming relevance, but the truth is they lost mind share a long time ago - MS purchases of minecraft, linkedin and recently activision blizzard were prime examples of trying to buy their way back into the market.

                  I have nothing "against" wayland in that sense, the idea is a good one - but to succeed it needs to actually be better, and there is no evidence it passes even that basic hurdle.

                  Comment

                  • mrg666
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2023
                    • 1012

                    Originally posted by Weasel View Post
                    No, it's going ass backwards to MS DOS era, closer to one app per screen bullshit. The less control the user has, the worse it is.

                    Tiling WMs are probably half the reason Wayland is in such garbage state, it seems it's all it cares about. Disgusting beyond belief.
                    Don't forget one pill a day preferably after a meal and feel free to take another when you feel the urge/rage to argue.

                    Comment

                    • Weasel
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2017
                      • 4422

                      Originally posted by mrg666 View Post
                      Don't forget one pill a day preferably after a meal and feel free to take another when you feel the urge/rage to argue.
                      I take way more supplements than that to keep my body in healthy and younger condition.

                      Sorry you can't afford it. Must be tough. X11 lets me get shit done and automating my life with scripts so I don't waste my time.

                      Maybe if your tiling WMs were as productive you'd have a ton of money to burn on supplements too.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X